Increasing the amount and energy level of the electrons supplied to the klystrons by free space electrons will increase the maximum thermionic current density and increase the total current supplied by the klystron allowing the klystron to produce significantly higher energy well beyond the original invention design gain specifications.

Renewable electron mass has many advantages in NLS space propulsion. These are other physical effects that will also improve the energy to mass ratio but it is beyond the scope of this news piece.

“Science fiction usually becomes science fact”, Dr. Stephen Hawking.

Which calculations suggest such amount of thrust? It would require a lot of speedy electrons to make the shuttle with some payload accelerate at 1g. And the grid with amount of time is funny. A kind of useless trip – 28 years in ship time, and 2 million years passing on earth. New species of dinosaurs will appear in the meantime.

Your absolutely right. Where is you proof ?

Should we consider your comments as proof ?

Do you have solution ?

Should we stop looking for a solution ?

Should mankind just die out because its impossible ?

Man will never, ever, reach the nearest star.

Judging by what I know of most sy-ops and team members, most never use their full names and I am sure this person did not as well as I am sure being an officer he is quite smart. It would seem the Officer who has earned the respect did his 23 years as I have read and served it proudly long after the 14 years you spent in the Navy Mr. Wallace. And, I am quiet sure that you being retired nor any enlisted personal would have access to such highly classified Navel personal records, let alone publicly say they have access to such records.

Bottom line is, my hats off to all that have served our great Country!

I’ve taken the time to check the pdf again and i still don’t see anything about deceleration as you stated, the powerpoint file also doesn’t talk about it.

When you state your position you should offer facts to back them up. I still see none and you still seem
to enjoy angry illogical banter. I will leave it at that.

Good day to you sir,

holoman

About deceleration i didn’t see anything in either the pdf nor the website, i’ll check it out once again when i have the time to see if the points i raised on that matter are in fact accounted for. By the way deceleration shouldn’t be at halfway point except on short travels for which maximum speed wouldn’t be reached…

On the contrary of what you may think this is hardly a new direction or a path noone has bothered going as there are tens if not hundreds of projects like this one that exist already. Some having been imagined by very respectable scientists.
So yes this new nuclear-powered engine may be original and perhaps better than other solutions imagined so far, i certainly hope so, time will tell.
But to me it still smells of scam, the way it’s being presented, giving hopes that exceed current physics laws. I guess there’s a credibility issue that arises naturally from such a poor presentation.

There are however some scientist that have already imagined ways in which faster than light speed travel or even time travel might be possible but we’re still far from poving those theories are right, let alone trying to implement them.

Deceleration at the half way point is presented in the pdf and website link, please read. Is it wrong to try and present a new direction of thought, maybe it will work and maybe it will not. But maybe it will help others to break out of the box and start thinking in a new direction also.

Mankind has everything to loose if we don’t start now.

I haven’t read any data or scientific proof, only opinions, stating otherwise. The author has presented data and atleast some scientific proof for his thinking in this direction.

I don’t see any reason to use such words as,, scam,, if you are an intelligent being using this insulting approach definitely effects your credibility with me.

Zorg, the correction has been make on the website by the author.

This is a subject that needs to be debated and just like politics their will always be democrats, republicans, and independent thinkers, that is the beauty of free thought.

As the author states, “Do not go where the path may lead,” wrote Ralph Waldo Emerson. “Go instead where there is no path, and leave a trail.”

I believe he just did that by bringing this new idea to our attention.

So yes to me it smells like scam when the science facts aren’t straight and big $$ are involved.
I sincerely hope i’ll be proven wrong, that instead of a scam it was just PR overhyping, and would even love to work on such an achievement which would already be incredibly useful if only limited to our solar system.