<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP&#8217;s China re-cycling effort</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:42:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215/comment-page-1#comment-508459</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215#comment-508459</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just the recycling but the prevention of toxic components ending up in landfills.  Recycling needs to be a much more important criteria during the design phase as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not just the recycling but the prevention of toxic components ending up in landfills.  Recycling needs to be a much more important criteria during the design phase as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215/comment-page-1#comment-173393</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13215#comment-173393</guid>
		<description>Somehow I feel the &quot;recycling&quot; of old computers and associated products has more to do with preventing used items from reaching the aftermarket and competing with new equipment than it does with any environmental concern. On one hand, we hear of a &quot;digital divide&quot; because low cost computers on not availiable. On the other, repairable and salvagable items are slated for destruction so they wont reach landfills. Or the desks of low income persons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I feel the &#8220;recycling&#8221; of old computers and associated products has more to do with preventing used items from reaching the aftermarket and competing with new equipment than it does with any environmental concern. On one hand, we hear of a &#8220;digital divide&#8221; because low cost computers on not availiable. On the other, repairable and salvagable items are slated for destruction so they wont reach landfills. Or the desks of low income persons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
