Comments on: Judge slams RIAA ‘boilerplate’ http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266 p2pnet.net - reader powered Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:52:19 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266/comment-page-1#comment-176450 Reader's Write Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:45:43 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266#comment-176450 As a lawyer in California, I can assure you our legal system is neither different, nor more efficient. Seems the RIAA just hit a judge who woke up in the morning cranky for civil rights. Good on him. As a lawyer in California, I can assure you our legal system is neither different, nor more efficient. Seems the RIAA just hit a judge who woke up in the morning cranky for civil rights. Good on him.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266/comment-page-1#comment-175447 Reader's Write Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:01:20 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266#comment-175447 Corection to previous post: "Assuming that the lawsuit was filed shorltly AFTER default had been established" Make that "Assuming that the lawsuit was filed BEFOE default had been established" Corection to previous post:

“Assuming that the lawsuit was filed shorltly AFTER default had been established”

Make that

“Assuming that the lawsuit was filed BEFOE default had been established”

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266/comment-page-1#comment-174837 Reader's Write Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:18:36 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266#comment-174837 Was this actually C&P from the court documents. I only ask cause it seems to be a case that hasn't even been filed yet: "...Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant on November 14, 2007,..." Was this actually C&P from the court documents. I only ask cause it seems to be a case that hasn’t even been filed yet:

“…Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendant on November 14, 2007,…”

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266/comment-page-1#comment-174821 Reader's Write Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:09:16 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13266#comment-174821 Is the so called "court efficiency" just a meaningless slogan..... Assuming that the lawsuit was filed shorltly after default had been established (30 days after filing of lawsuit) one has to wonder why the same type of case with the same time of infringement claim have not been dismissed as quickly or at all. Is Cailifornia another country with an altogether different legal and efficient system? Is the so called amercian "court efficiency" just a meaningless slogan proferred only to have the public believe that the system is efficient when it is not and when in fact it is incredibly inefficient and where money is almost fully wasted? Is the so called “court efficiency” just a meaningless slogan…..

Assuming that the lawsuit was filed shorltly after default had been established (30 days after filing of lawsuit) one has to wonder why the same type of case with the same time of infringement claim have not been dismissed as quickly or at all.

Is Cailifornia another country with an altogether different legal and efficient system?

Is the so called amercian “court efficiency” just a meaningless slogan proferred only to have the public believe that the system is efficient when it is not and when in fact it is incredibly inefficient and where money is almost fully wasted?

]]>