<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dan Rather sues CBS for $70M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:03:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378/comment-page-1#comment-179860</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 12:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378#comment-179860</guid>
		<description>Rather hired a RIAA lawyer?

Seventy million????
There must be a copyright infringement somewhere. Only copyright holders think they are owed fabulous amounts for nothing. Read on to understand.

Another possiblity. Rather hired a RIAA lawyer.
Only a RIAA lawyer would come up with the argument that someone who copied a song track should pay up to $150,000 in damages when, the worst case scenario was that by copying a track the alleged infringer did not then buy the track for 99 cents and the 99 cents was the actual loss, at most, to the record label.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather hired a RIAA lawyer?</p>
<p>Seventy million????<br />
There must be a copyright infringement somewhere. Only copyright holders think they are owed fabulous amounts for nothing. Read on to understand.</p>
<p>Another possiblity. Rather hired a RIAA lawyer.<br />
Only a RIAA lawyer would come up with the argument that someone who copied a song track should pay up to $150,000 in damages when, the worst case scenario was that by copying a track the alleged infringer did not then buy the track for 99 cents and the 99 cents was the actual loss, at most, to the record label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378/comment-page-1#comment-179265</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13378#comment-179265</guid>
		<description>I hope he win though. This will give us a change from fox noise as Oberman saiy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he win though. This will give us a change from fox noise as Oberman saiy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
