<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: hackers grab US power grid!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:47:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Water Equipment Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457/comment-page-1#comment-976725</link>
		<dc:creator>Water Equipment Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457#comment-976725</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the thoughts on:p2pnet news  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Video: hackers grab US power grid! about water equipment technologies but must admit I find your idea a little challenging as I have been visiting this since last Saturday and am not sure whether I agree with your thoughts...  : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the thoughts on:p2pnet news  &raquo; Blog Archive   &raquo; Video: hackers grab US power grid! about water equipment technologies but must admit I find your idea a little challenging as I have been visiting this since last Saturday and am not sure whether I agree with your thoughts&#8230;  : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457/comment-page-1#comment-182622</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457#comment-182622</guid>
		<description>I find this interesting. From the standpoint of someone who worked with equipment through remote operations by computer. Often the equipment controlled was miles away from the computer terminal that did the controlling. 

I often wondered about someone being able to get into the system from outside. The technology being used to remote sense the operations were outmoded/obsolete technologies once used widely in the communications industry. 

The ability to reach into the system from higher authority existed as well. There were times when we had to leave the local control and go to a remote location a hundred miles or more distant from the main control we normally used. This remote control was the engineer&#039;s back up monitoring location. 

I am being very circumspect about the feild, company, and usage. I will not answer the who, why, or where because of this. Let us just say that it was done this way and leave it at that for this instance. 

Still shutdowns were tied into the remote system. Valve controls, engine controls and various sensors to pick up out of parameter conditions all existed in the same packages. The network was extensive and the areas controlled huge. 

Then this sort of article pops up and it really makes me wonder afresh about a job I no longer do as I am no longer with that particular company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this interesting. From the standpoint of someone who worked with equipment through remote operations by computer. Often the equipment controlled was miles away from the computer terminal that did the controlling. </p>
<p>I often wondered about someone being able to get into the system from outside. The technology being used to remote sense the operations were outmoded/obsolete technologies once used widely in the communications industry. </p>
<p>The ability to reach into the system from higher authority existed as well. There were times when we had to leave the local control and go to a remote location a hundred miles or more distant from the main control we normally used. This remote control was the engineer&#8217;s back up monitoring location. </p>
<p>I am being very circumspect about the feild, company, and usage. I will not answer the who, why, or where because of this. Let us just say that it was done this way and leave it at that for this instance. </p>
<p>Still shutdowns were tied into the remote system. Valve controls, engine controls and various sensors to pick up out of parameter conditions all existed in the same packages. The network was extensive and the areas controlled huge. </p>
<p>Then this sort of article pops up and it really makes me wonder afresh about a job I no longer do as I am no longer with that particular company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457/comment-page-1#comment-182555</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13457#comment-182555</guid>
		<description>this is why no Nuclear plant is connected to the web. 

some things are just better left disconnected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is why no Nuclear plant is connected to the web. </p>
<p>some things are just better left disconnected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
