enuff said

Now I know her name but she still has as much effect on my life as does Paris Hilton, which is to say, I recognise the name but beyond that is the great void and lack of interest to know more. The idea that it is fodder for the news media only reflects to me the dumbing down of broadcast news. There is no meat to the subjects that make them interesting to me and there is no way they intrude upon my life in such a way as to affect it beyond noticing that the names occupy a space in a news article that is filler.

So what I get out of this is that it is the teen version remake of Grease, changed a bit so there is no copyright claims that can be made for infringement.

Lets face it, corporate media is down to the remake of the remake of the remake. Fresh ideas no longer exist in a formulated backdrop designed with the shareholders in mind and not willing to take chances for the sake of art itself. The epic age of dumbed down mediocre offerings now reigns supreme.

I realised a few years ago that I no longer was connected to what passes for entertainment on the broadcast media. I looked at tv shows that others found humorous, saw the canned laughter as the cue the punch line had passed by, and thought to myself it was awful when they have to tell you where the punchline is because you might not have enough intelligence to recognise it when it went by. It totally removed any remaining thought that such programs were entertainment to me. I honestly can not see where the public finds humor in such subpar shows.

at least the BBC had the good sense to air it after midnight (where I live) when almost noone watched it .

and for free.

too bad Oz parents paid for ppv.

how many times has it been downloaded in free p2p? countless times.