RIAA attacks University of New Mexico

p2pnet news | RIAA News:- A judge in New Mexico has struck a blow upholding the rights of people being attacked by Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMGs RIAA, said p2pnet recently, going on:
In an escalation of its aberrant marketing efforts to use so far unproven copyright infringements to force people to buy digital downloads produced by its masters, the Big 4, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) is currently targeting students at universities across America. It threatens school administrators, who then bring tremendous pressure to bear on their own students. Very few schools have resisted.
However, unprompted, chief US magistrate judge Lorenzo F. Garcia saw through the RIAA’s bid to use him to compel the University of New Mexico to hand over the identities of students.
Now, “UNM received a subpoena Thursday from the Recording Industry Association of America, demanding the University release the names of 16 UNM network users suspected of illegal file sharing,” says the Daily Lobo, going on:
The University has information for only one or two network users, said Richard Mertz, a lawyer for UNM. “Things are moving forward,” Mertz said “It’s bad news for at least one person.”
And, “UNM and the association came to an agreement about how to release the names of the network users, and the subpoenas were issued.”
The RIAA falsely claims IP addresses are enough to identify alleged file sharers.
However, “Even if the Internet service provider keeps very detailed access logs, it’s nearly impossible to prove that a certain IP address was used by a particular person at any given time,” notes Anders Bylund.
Meanwhile, “UNM is looking for the network IDs and will answer the subpoenas at the end of October,” the Dailoy Lobo has Mertz saying, and the story goes on:
Mertz said the network user who faces the largest suit has been accused of illegally sharing 1,463 songs.
The minimum fine for each song is $750, Mertz said.
He said users could be sued for up to $150,000 per song.
“I don’t know of any case where someone has been fined the maximum penalty,” Mertz said. “But if you get the wrong judge, we’re theoretically looking at some astronomical numbers.”
Get the wrong judge? The RIAA has yet to go to court.
By careful manipulation of mainstream and university media, it’s managed to terrorise students and staffs alike at universities across America without ever winning or even trying a single case.
In fact, what’s probably the first-ever RIAA trial is slated for next month.
Mertz said users could have settled with the RIAA for about $3,500 for a month after the first notices were received in May.
But now it will be more expensive to settle, he said.
Talk about doing the RIAA’s work for it.
The Daily Lobo continues:
“Basically, students may also be responsible for legal fees incurred for litigation on the part of RIAA,” Mertz said.
And …
Mertz said UNM continues to receive notices requesting it to save network information of users suspected of illegally sharing music.
Only the first 16 notices have been followed up with lawsuits, Mertz said.
The University received notice of another possible lawsuit Monday, he said.
“That’s one more student in the dorms somewhere who might get sued by the RIAA,” he said. “So, it’s an ongoing process.”
On Tuesday a student and another university asked p2pnet readers to help in paying RIAA extortion money.
We said, “Sorry, but the sad reality is: this wouldn’t be helping you, it’d be helping the RIAA and just as bad, would be encouraging you to incriminate yourself on behalf of the RIAA and its masters, Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG.”
We went on to quote Recording Industry vs The People’s Ray Beckerman who says, THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, going on:
HOWEVER, I DO ADVISE YOU TO GET LEGAL ADVICE, AND NOT TO TAKE YOUR ADVICE FROM THE RIAA, THE MPAA, YOUR SCHOOL, OR ANYONE ELSE WHO IS NOT YOUR LAWYER.
These are my suggestions to college students being targeted by the RIAA:
1. Join together with other students who are being targeted, pool your financial resources, and hire an attorney who is ready, willing, and able to (a) advise you of your rights and (b) fight the RIAA’s ‘John Doe’ cases when they are brought.
2. Bring to your college or university’s attention my ‘Open Letter to Colleges and Universities‘
3. Join or start campus charters of Digital Freedom and/or FreeCulture.
4. Remember that the RIAA does not presently have your identity, and that by calling them or visiting their web site you may be giving them your identity.
5. Read and learn about your rights. E.g., review Electronic Frontier Foundation page, RIAA v. the Students: An FAQ for ‘Pre-Lawsuit’ Letter Targets
6. Organize.
7. Organize.
8. Organize.
Mertz would do well to read Beckerman’s open letter.
Or maybe he should have a word with his opposite numbers at Harvard because its students don’t seem to be appearing on the RIAA hit lists.
Said Charles Nessor, William F. Weld professor of law, Harvard Law School, and founder and faculty co-director, Berkman Center for Internet & Society; and John Palfrey, clinical professor of law and executive director, the Berkman Center:
This Spring, 1,200 pre-litigation letters arrived unannounced at universities across the country. The RIAA promises more will follow. These letters tell the university which students the RIAA plans on suing, identifying the students only by their IP addresses, the ‘license plates’ of Internet connections.
Because the RIAA does not know the names behind the IP addresses, the letters ask the universities to deliver the notices to the proper students, rather than relying upon the ordinary legal mechanisms.
Universities should have no part in this extraordinary process.
Also See:
p2pnet – Judge Garcia foils the RIAA, June 20, 2007
Daily Lobo – RIAA subpoenas University, September 26, 2007
notes Anders Bylund – RIAA and the Music Luddites, September 24, 2006
slated for next month – First-ever RIAA trial?, September 27, 2006
RIAA extortion money – Help! RIAA victim asks p2pnet, September 25, 2006
RIAA does not know – New wave of RIAA extortion letters
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.






September 28th, 2007 at 10:55 am
This Mertz guy seems like an idiot. And I say that with full knowledge of his status with the university. Keep in mind his JOB is to primarily protect the legal interests of the university and NOT the students. Remind him of “FERPA” (Google it) and how your (students’) personal information is Federally protected, lawsuit notwithstanding.
Ask him, point blank, to show you the law that says “it is illegal to offer files, copyrighted or not, for download by members of the public over the internet.” He won’t be able to since there is none. It is not illegal to “upload files or offer to upload files.” The crime occurs at the receiving party using the files in a manner that is not appropriate by terms of the licensing agreement. IANAL, however you know the entire online world will be watching this trial starting in a few days…I hope “our” side’s attorney does not muck it up by being dumb…he needs to read the recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com website.
October 17th, 2007 at 10:32 am
UNM sent this to all students today. Nice to know we have their support and that they might be willing to testify to things like how easy it is to spoof, or that the keys to all of their access points are completely open, or that their registration form can be hacked. Maybe a subpoena would help them defend their students.
X-Real-To:
Return-Path:
Received: from [129.24.8.64] (HELO bianca.unm.edu)
by regor.unm.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6)
with ESMTPS id 95296811; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:49:59 -0600
Received: from bianca.unm.edu (bianca.unm.edu [129.24.8.64])
by bianca.unm.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9GIMaVV019511;
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:49:59 -0600
Received: by LIST.UNM.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 4722483
for ALLSTU-L@LIST.UNM.EDU; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:49:58 -0600
Approved-By: stulists@UNM.EDU
Received: from unm.edu (f5vs2.unm.edu [64.106.76.41]) by bianca.unm.edu
(8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l9H1nTis027146 for
; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:49:29 -0600
X-PMX-Host: Theta
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report=’SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05,
NO_REAL_NAME 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0,
__HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0,
__MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0′
X-PMX-Version: x1 5.3.3.310218, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.2.313940,
Antispam-Data: 2007.10.16.182922
Received: from [129.24.191.62] (account stulists@unm.edu) by theta.unm.edu
(CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.6) with HTTP id 18428868; Tue, 16 Oct
2007 19:49:29 -0600
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=”ISO-8859-1″; format=”flowed”
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:49:29 -0600
Reply-To: stulists@unm.edu
Sender: All Students Mailing List
From: stulists@unm.edu
Subject: Illegal Music File Sharing
Comments: To: allstu-l@unm.edu
To: ALLSTU-L@LIST.UNM.EDU
Precedence: list
Sharing copyrighted material on the Internet without
appropriate permissions is
illegal. When you use UNM resources, like the campus data
network,
to illegally share copyrighted material, it is also a
violation of
UNM policy. Many of you know that the Recording
> Industry Association of America (RIAA) has been aggressively suing
> students at many universities for copyright infringement. UNM is
> among the universities that have been targeted by the RIAA.
>
> The RIAA and other owners of copyrighted works, such as movies,
> continuously monitor UNM’s network to detect illegal file sharing.
> UNM has received hundreds of notices of illegal file sharing from
> these companies in the last year. When such notices are received, UNM typically disconnects the Internet Protocol
address from the network. This spring the RIAA began
> sending notices to UNM indicating that it intended to sue certain
> students at UNM and identified them by their Internet Protocol
> address. Lawsuits were filed by the RIAA in federal district court
> in Albuquerque and UNM has received subpoenas seeking
> information on the identify of the alleged file sharers on the UNM
> network. UNM must comply with a valid subpoena issued by a federal
> court.
>
> Recently the RIAA indicated that more lawsuits would soon be filed naming additional UNM students, unless those
students agree to pay many thousands of dollars each to settle RIAA claims against them. Illegal file sharing has
become
> a risky undertaking at UNM, carrying with it a chance of becoming a
> defendant in a federal lawsuit. A student who is sued by the RIAA
> or other copyright content owner will be responsible for all costs,
> judgments and settlements of such a lawsuit. UNM will not become
> involved in the lawsuit on behalf of students.
>
> UNM strongly recommends that students should cease illegal file
> sharing of music, movies, software and computer games in order to
> avoid this legal liability.
Dr. Eliseo Torres
Vice President for Student Affairs