Comments on: RIAA ’sue ‘em all’ war losing money

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:48:28 +0000

A former congressional aide, Mitch Glazier successfully inserted a secret special interest section into a major bill passed by Congress. For the favor he was hired by the special interest group. He remains at large having not been arrested and charged with this activity.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:42:03 +0000

1. Sony must not be allowed to trade in the US or with any companies trading with any US entity, because of their business practices on warranties, their past behavior with stealing software in order to secretly install “rootkits” in a copyright product not theirs to safeguard their own copyright products, that they ruined computers of their customers in doing so without replacing them, for their product recommendation/warranty practices, and for having their lawyer lie before a jury.

2. Jennifer Pariser must be charged with perjury for lying that a copyright recorded for later use is stealing knowing the law in view of the fact that she did pass a bar examination.

3. RIAA and subsidiary entities must be charged with racketeering under existing RICO statutes for such acts as extorting settlements, for attempts to insert special legislation into bills

4. RIAA has attempted to insert special legislation “License to Virus” into unrelated bills giving it impunity if it destroys computers in banks, homes and businesses even if those machines have never had copyright material on them. This attempt is a threat to everyone including computers at power companies, and those involved with national security. This attempt should be enough to close RIAA down and charge the persons involved with it with enough to put them away for life.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:30:51 +0000

2. Jennifer Pariser must be charged with perjury for lying that a copyright recorded for later use is stealing knowing the law in view of the fact that she did pass a bar examination.

3. RIAA, the American Bankers Association and certain other entities must be charged with racketeering under existing RICO statutes for such acts as extorting settlements, and for illegal money lending practices.

4. Attempts to bribe congress and insert special interest legislation using congressional aides later hired by RIAA>

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:29:39 +0000

From this day forward I will not purchase any Sony product of any kind. I do not copy music files or even share CDs and DVDs I own. But I am totally offended by Sony abuse of the legal system, attacks on innocent people, and general bullying of the public. Although I presently own many Sony products ranging from Large screen TVs to Stereo eqt, and many CD and DVD titles, NOW even seeing the brand name of sony in my household has become offensive. I regret ever having given any business sony, and refuse to give any business to them or any other corporate bully in the future.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 07:02:02 +0000

The number of those that settle is not exactly know but a safe estimate go between 2k-4k people.
It’s mean that they would have to sue as many as 20k. For now there is only 33 cases pending and so far they lost all of them. Needless to say that they can not afford it so they are certainly lossing money. And then there is the money they loss in the boycott that are in the 100 of million that are slowly killing the 4 majors that control the RIAA. But then like the dinosaurs they are too stupid to get that. Extinction! Extinction! Extinction! Few more years left only and they will become just a bad memory! Yes! For those who serttle it is time to start a class action law suit at least or better a criminal law suit and recover the money they extorted to you with interest and penalty before they totally sink.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:39:02 +0000

“Everyone is jumping for joy that they might be losing money in this campaign of terror, that they forget she works for these purveyors of evil, and may possess the same proclivities that her employer does. Namely, proclivities of deception. Remember, claiming this as fact and without protestation, their reputation will be untarnished. And reputation is everything to a jury. If they are exposed as reprobate antagonists in this allegory, antipathy will soon be unleashed upon the plaintiffs.”

She could also face JAIL TIME for LYING TO A JURY if it is ever proven to be true also. It is called perjury!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

Perjury is the act of lying or making verifiably false statements on a material matter under oath or affirmation in a court of law or in any of various sworn statements in writing. Perjury is a crime because the witness has sworn to tell the truth and, for the credibility of the court, witness testimony must be relied on as being truthful. Perjury is considered a serious offense as it can be used to usurp the power of the courts, resulting in miscarriages of justice. In the United States, for example, the general perjury statute under Federal law provides for a prison sentence of up to five years, and is found at 18 U.S.C. § 1621. See also 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

By: Jon

Jon — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:08:17 +0000

When “top litigator for the Sony-BMG Music Group” Jennifer Pariser, asked if she thought copying a song from a CD you own should be allowed, answers flatly, “when an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song,” and gets away with it, what are you going to do?

By: ben

ben — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:50:48 +0000

Of course she could just be lying to speciously appear as educators rather than profiteers. Thereby appealing to the sensibilities of the jurors.

Everyone is jumping for joy that they might be losing money in this campaign of terror, that they forget she works for these purveyors of evil, and may possess the same proclivities that her employer does. Namely, proclivities of deception. Remember, claiming this as fact and without protestation, their reputation will be untarnished. And reputation is everything to a jury. If they are exposed as reprobate antagonists in this allegory, antipathy will soon be unleashed upon the plaintiffs.