<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The RIAA, lawsuits &#8212; and shareholders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Venegas</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568/comment-page-1#comment-187343</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael Venegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568#comment-187343</guid>
		<description>Adding to the previous post, also, lawyers are the only members of a profession that de-facto own and control a branch of government, the judicial.

As long as the branch of goverment does not allow a farmer, a teacher, an electrician, an engineer, into executive positions within the branch or as judges, the lawyers have a corruptive ownership of the branch.

The result of a stupid constitution written by... you guessed it, lawyers.

The argument that laws or judicial rules are too complex for non lawyers is flawed, as these rules (laws are rules too) should be written for the people, not for lawyers.

Lawyers do have an important role in representing clients and giving legal advise but not in owning a brach of government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding to the previous post, also, lawyers are the only members of a profession that de-facto own and control a branch of government, the judicial.</p>
<p>As long as the branch of goverment does not allow a farmer, a teacher, an electrician, an engineer, into executive positions within the branch or as judges, the lawyers have a corruptive ownership of the branch.</p>
<p>The result of a stupid constitution written by&#8230; you guessed it, lawyers.</p>
<p>The argument that laws or judicial rules are too complex for non lawyers is flawed, as these rules (laws are rules too) should be written for the people, not for lawyers.</p>
<p>Lawyers do have an important role in representing clients and giving legal advise but not in owning a brach of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyberscan</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568/comment-page-1#comment-186951</link>
		<dc:creator>cyberscan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13568#comment-186951</guid>
		<description>Lawyers are America&#039;s aristocrats.  Despite prohibitions by the U.S. Constitution of the practice of bestowing nobility, the state and federal governments do this very thing.  By passing laws that require judges and lawyers to be a member of the British Aristocrat Association BAR, they have effectively mandated membership in this cartel in order to defend or prosecute people in court.  This also shows why most government policies and court decisions favor the well to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers are America&#8217;s aristocrats.  Despite prohibitions by the U.S. Constitution of the practice of bestowing nobility, the state and federal governments do this very thing.  By passing laws that require judges and lawyers to be a member of the British Aristocrat Association BAR, they have effectively mandated membership in this cartel in order to defend or prosecute people in court.  This also shows why most government policies and court decisions favor the well to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


