Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

US spy bill approved

p2pnet news | Freedom:- America’s Senate Intelligence Committee has passed legislation which would see the Bush administration’s warrantless surveillance program at least partially controlled.

However, it also bows to White House demands that telecommunications companies which aid government spying efforts shouldn’t be open to lawsuits.

Passage came with, “one unexpected hitch,” says the New York Times, going on that after the closed session, Oregon’s Ron Wyden said he’d succeeded, by 9 to 6, “in adding an amendment that would offer additional protections by requiring that the government get a warrant whenever it wanted to wiretap an American outside the country, like an American soldier based overseas or a business person”.

“But Mr. Wyden said the administration vigorously opposed that measure and was threatening to veto any final bill if it is included,” the story says.

“The measure, passed 13-2, represents a tentative deal between a key Senate panel and the White House,” says the Los Angeles Times, continuing:

“The issue has been a source of acrimony since it was revealed nearly two years ago that Bush had authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop without court warrants on conversations of Americans.

“But the committee’s compromise faces a series of challenges. Those include opposition from other members of the Senate as well as a competing House bill that would impose tighter restrictions on spy agencies and deny any legal protections to phone companies.”

The main difference between the two, “comes down to the question of giving immunity to the major telephone carriers - AT&T and Verizon - that are now being sued over their roles in the eavesdropping program after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11,” says the NYT.

The House bill doesn’t grant immunity and, “That’s the biggest sticking point,” it has a senior House staff member acknowledging.

Meanwhile, the legislation would overhaul the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act passed to, “crack down on domestic spying abuses by the CIA and other agencies,” says the LA Times, going on that “top” US intelligence officials want sweeping revisions, “arguing that the law has not kept pace with the emergence of the Internet, the spread of cellphones and other telecommunications advances”.

Under the intelligence committee’s approach, the NSA would have, “clear authority to intercept calls and e-mails between foreigners, even when they cross over networks inside the United States,” says the story, adding:

The bill would also allow the NSA to monitor communications between a suspect overseas and someone in the United States, without a warrant. Instead, the government would be required to win court approval for the procedures it uses to determine that its surveillance targets are outside the country.

Other provisions in the legislation, which would expire in six years, requires the government to get court approval whenever an American is targeted overseas.

SlashdotSlashdot it! Add to Technorati Favorites

Also See:
New York Times - Panel Approves Eavesdropping Compromise, October 19, 2007
Los Angeles Times - Senate panel OKs spying legislation, October 19, 2007

HOME

6 Responses to “US spy bill approved”

  1. Reader's Write Says:

    By the constitution a law can not be made retroactively. So if they want to pass a unconstitutional law such as the DMCA the law will be nulle and enforcing it will be a crime.
    All these ellected officals are sworn to defend the cosntitution. Therefore if it goes this way we will have to dismiss our entire governement the comgress the executive the legislative and the justice. Then organize new election according to the constitution.

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    Ex post facto is unconstitutional, but they can prevent any new lawsuits from being filed. There may be an argument for those lawsuits already in the works though.

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    impeachbush.com

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    throw bush out of office

    throw the democrats and republicans in congress whom collaborated with him out

    then kill the political careers of their appointees and advisers just to drive the point home

  5. Reader's Write Says:

    also throw out all those associated with the DMCA and patriot acts

  6. Reader's Write Says:

    the 3 mainstream politicians left in this country can run the government :)

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy