<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quarter of a million unlocked iPhones!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:51:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768/comment-page-1#comment-198590</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768#comment-198590</guid>
		<description>Why would ANYONE want a phone that you can only have ONE PROVIDER of service? 

Some people  must have a screw loose to buy an iphone in the first place knowing how restrictive it is.

Fuck the iphone. No one is going to tell me what provider I can have. No one. That includes apple and AT&amp;T!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would ANYONE want a phone that you can only have ONE PROVIDER of service? </p>
<p>Some people  must have a screw loose to buy an iphone in the first place knowing how restrictive it is.</p>
<p>Fuck the iphone. No one is going to tell me what provider I can have. No one. That includes apple and AT&amp;T!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768/comment-page-1#comment-198375</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768#comment-198375</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone be the least bit surprised at this, considering the amount of bad publicity AT&amp;T received when it was revealed they played a part in the illegal wiretapping?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone be the least bit surprised at this, considering the amount of bad publicity AT&amp;T received when it was revealed they played a part in the illegal wiretapping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768/comment-page-1#comment-198290</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13768#comment-198290</guid>
		<description>ATT actually SBC/Cingular that fucked up their brand name so bad that they have to abadon it is such a crappy company that it is not surprising that people escape them.

Don&#039;t do business with AT&amp;T. THEY SUCKS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATT actually SBC/Cingular that fucked up their brand name so bad that they have to abadon it is such a crappy company that it is not surprising that people escape them.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t do business with AT&amp;T. THEY SUCKS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
