Comments on: New Da Vinci revelation! More! http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jon http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809/comment-page-1#comment-200150 Jon Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:09:27 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809#comment-200150 "jon deleted my comment ..." It was an accident. There were two spam comments above yours and I inadvertently deleted all three. Humble apologies :) Cheers! “jon deleted my comment …”

It was an accident. There were two spam comments above yours and I inadvertently deleted all three. Humble apologies :)

Cheers!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809/comment-page-1#comment-200129 Reader's Write Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:22:00 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809#comment-200129 "This looks like another crack-pot theory" Agree. But this is a lot of fun! Don't spoil it! “This looks like another crack-pot theory”

Agree. But this is a lot of fun! Don’t spoil it!

]]> By: uhu http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809/comment-page-1#comment-200122 uhu Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:10:09 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809#comment-200122 i didn't know what this was and jon deleted my comment. but now i get it. the 2nd one is definitely a sandeman ad ;) i didn’t know what this was and jon deleted my comment. but now i get it. the 2nd one is definitely a sandeman ad ;)

]]> By: sk8rpro http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809/comment-page-1#comment-200112 sk8rpro Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:01:12 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13809#comment-200112 This looks like another crack-pot theory. If there is anything worth noting of what I've learned in college, it is this, it is human nature to manipulate literature and art into a fashion they love, and sharing it with the world, leaving out the intent of the author/artist. It's been done so much so, people think that the interpretations are the true intent of the author, when in reality, it's just another creation. Remember after 9/11 when the $20 bill was folded in such a way that the Twin Towers were shown to be burning, while simultaneously showing the Pentagon is bombed? The U.S. Mint never designed it for that reason. Some would say it supports a government conspiracy, others would go so far as to say God destined for us to see this AFTER it happened - but others, such as myself would say the folding trick was fashioned in a way to cause horror and "oohs" and "ahs." Going back to this, I can't even follow much what they're showing. It seems to me like it is another crack-pot theory to amaze people what the artist did not intend. This looks like another crack-pot theory. If there is anything worth noting of what I’ve learned in college, it is this, it is human nature to manipulate literature and art into a fashion they love, and sharing it with the world, leaving out the intent of the author/artist. It’s been done so much so, people think that the interpretations are the true intent of the author, when in reality, it’s just another creation.

Remember after 9/11 when the $20 bill was folded in such a way that the Twin Towers were shown to be burning, while simultaneously showing the Pentagon is bombed? The U.S. Mint never designed it for that reason. Some would say it supports a government conspiracy, others would go so far as to say God destined for us to see this AFTER it happened – but others, such as myself would say the folding trick was fashioned in a way to cause horror and “oohs” and “ahs.”

Going back to this, I can’t even follow much what they’re showing. It seems to me like it is another crack-pot theory to amaze people what the artist did not intend.

]]>