It is nonsense to sue for copyright infringement someone because of what that someone plans to publish. In this case, Warner Bros Entertainment and Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling have to wait until an actual book is published and sold before filing a lawsuit.

This is another case of a lawyer a lawyer that does not know what copyright infringement is. Iam giving the lawyer the benefit of the doubt, because instead of inorance it could be malice and indifference to doing damage to others. Then the question is why are people, file sharers, that also may also not know what is copyright infringement, exposed to very damaging and disrupting lawsuit? Any answers?