Comments on: MPAA’s Lucky & Flo extreme makeovers

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:08:56 +0000

it works like htis. l and f sniff suspects bums. if its good theyre not guilty. If they dont like the aroma the suspects asses is grasses.

By: Rafael Venegas

Rafael Venegas — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:05:51 +0000

Has anyone figure out how Lucky and Flow are going to explain to the judge how their criteria for selecting their victims.. err, I mean their suspects.

After all to open the baggage of a suspect, unless all baggages are opened, there must be a reasonable reason to suspect a specific baggage, at least in the USA (as decided by the Supreme Court, that the police cannot check some car only at a police check point, it all or nothing). So Lucky and Flow are the ones that must explain to the judge or jury what reasonable reason they had to declare a specific bag as suspect.

Also. has anyone been acused and found guilty bases on testimony of Lucky and Flo (a measure of their success)?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:29:59 +0000

a little late for halloween?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:50:14 +0000

which one is glickman?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:49:56 +0000

good photoshopping

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:18:12 +0000

Woof! Just like the Beattles save for the fact that these ones are smarter, stronger and more social.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:51:50 +0000

lol nice picture right down to the pawicure and wag.. err wig..