Britney Spears ‘red light’ video online
p2pnet news | Music:- The bitter Britney Spears, Kevin Federline battle for custody of the couple’s two young children has taken another twist with paparazzi video footage surfacing of Spears apparently running a red light and crossing into oncoming traffic.
Bad enough, given all the other traffic problems she has, but her two sons were asleep in the backseat of the car, says E! Online.
To make things worse, “her court-appointed monitor was ducked down in the passenger’s seat,” says the story, going on:
“Adding fuel to the visitation-endangering fire, Spears also appeared to be texting while behind the wheel.”
Now Federline is demanding his ex-wife be banned from ferrying the children around.
Did she run the light?
Check out this YouTube video of the incident and decide for yourself.
Also See:
E! Online – Brit Hits Red Light in Custody Case, November 16, 2007
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for the download, and here for details. Click here or here to learn how to by-pass censorship in your area.
November 17th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
I’m no great fan of Britney’s. Still I believe everyone is entitled to some personal privacy. This is a clear case of hounding by the paparazzi. This is the same type of situtation that setup the death of Princess Diana. It is clearly heard in the vid that the paparazzi is telling her red light for one reason and one reason only. To get her to do the one thing she doesn’t want to be victim of, that of being hounded.
It is very clear that there needs to be some sort of controls put on this sort of behavior. In an earlier episode one of these paprazzi got his foot run over. Why? Because he is on top of his victims’ personal space in the process of getting the photo. Later he wants compensation where he had reasonable expection of the vehicle moving and had placed his body in harms way as a method of intimidation to prevent his victim from leaving while he did his invasion of that personal privacy.
To be clear here, I don’t want to know more about Britney. Nor do I want to know about Paris’s latest episode in life. For christ’s sake get a life folks. If you didn’t care about it either these vultures would not be hounding people. I would rather we had news we can use. This star invasion on the private lives is nothing any of us needs that bad to make the paprazzi invade anyone’s private life, including your own. Think about this for a minute.
Everyone has their 15 minutes of fame, or at least that is the supposition. So when your’s comes around, do you want the paprazzi all over your lawn, breaking down your fences, invading your house by intrustion just to get that shot? Life throws some odd ball curves and any of us could be the next passing news interest.
I for one don’t care for it and in this case would probably have done the same, given the past experiences that Britney has had. There isn’t anything good in this type of behavior and the system as well as Joe Six pack should be able to tell when enough is enough.
November 17th, 2007 at 6:39 pm
Little miss belached-turd, turbo-bitch, millionaire, meth-head should hire a limo service to transport her and her brood safely.
It more than obvious she can’t drive, and accept the reality she is a photographer magnet.
what is it with these celebrity/attention whores? They knew photographers came along with stardom….Why they can’t grasp the reality that they have to deal with or manage photographers, is beyond comprehension.
Instead they just complain and then in the same breath turn around and do something more stupid to attract even more attention.
January 8th, 2008 at 4:35 am
I wanna be rich too!!!