<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Sony music site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1407/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1407</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:56:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1407/comment-page-1#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 06:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>Sony just wants to give the appearence of providing a comprehensive service, Big Music doesn&#039;t want online distribution as it currently exists (ie see variable pricing desires) so to appease the powers that be (read lawmakers, competition bureaus etc) they&#039;ll put up this piece of cr$%.  Funny how they all are failing (minus Apple and thats debatable) yet they all keep following the same business model - and in this case the usability, fair use etc is even worse than it&#039;s peers.

Don&#039;t look for it to change anytime soon, unless it suits the Rec Cos long-term goal of complete domination of what, who and where we listen/view entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony just wants to give the appearence of providing a comprehensive service, Big Music doesn&#8217;t want online distribution as it currently exists (ie see variable pricing desires) so to appease the powers that be (read lawmakers, competition bureaus etc) they&#8217;ll put up this piece of cr$%.  Funny how they all are failing (minus Apple and thats debatable) yet they all keep following the same business model &#8211; and in this case the usability, fair use etc is even worse than it&#8217;s peers.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t look for it to change anytime soon, unless it suits the Rec Cos long-term goal of complete domination of what, who and where we listen/view entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
