<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA, MPAA, to presidential candidates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077/comment-page-1#comment-216135</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077#comment-216135</guid>
		<description>I am against them and I have a lot of  equipement. 
They has been warned.

If I was them I will start running now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am against them and I have a lot of  equipement.<br />
They has been warned.</p>
<p>If I was them I will start running now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esteban</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077/comment-page-1#comment-216107</link>
		<dc:creator>Esteban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077#comment-216107</guid>
		<description>As they run out of consistent arguments, they take the George W. approach: &quot;Either you&#039;re with us, or your against us&quot;
Great, that means they&#039;re heading towards the end.
But don&#039;t worry guys, there are plenty of corporations in need of high-paid lobbyists that would say anything for a few (million) bucks!

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they run out of consistent arguments, they take the George W. approach: &#8220;Either you&#8217;re with us, or your against us&#8221;<br />
Great, that means they&#8217;re heading towards the end.<br />
But don&#8217;t worry guys, there are plenty of corporations in need of high-paid lobbyists that would say anything for a few (million) bucks!</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077/comment-page-1#comment-215564</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077#comment-215564</guid>
		<description>A supporting answer from any politician will result in a no vote from me beyond doubt. When you add to it all the students coming out of unis in the next few years, support for this blatent panhandling will come back to bite any politician seeking support from this direction. 

Not only will they earn the ire of future voters which might not concern them now, they will earn the ire of those already adult voters that are under the gun along with each victims circle of friends. There are others that will join this group as well. 

Those that are in the webmaster business, those in the indies that see these tatics as one of the reasons they can&#039;t get air time to be heard on the radio, those that are p2pers, even those that consider the now outrageous lengths of copyright as stifling them in producing new technologies and new products for fear of facing some of the penalities that the now sitting legislatures have made making the inventors or manufactors liable will hold the same animosity. 

It won&#039;t do much good to feed at the through if you can&#039;t get voted in. So make those deals as you will but remember, the American people are fed up with a government that isn&#039;t listening to anything but corporation and they are considering taking back what is rightfully theirs by way of vote. Its &quot;for the people by the people&quot; and those now setting in government are showing no consideration beyond where the next buck is coming from. I personally am ready to see rescinded the ability of the corporation to donate to any one candidate and instead donate to a pool. I am beginning to also favor the removal of person status for the corporation and leave it with no public voice in relation to government by law.

The corporation has purchased it&#039;s existance and bulled it&#039;s way into government influance. Through this method, it has now gained back what it lost in the early 20&#039;s. The broken up Bell corporation has now reformed, no longer being held back by law. Oil companies that were broken up have now merged back into the main 4 players. We have went backwards, not forward with the last generation of lawmakers accepting the bribe to make laws in favor of these actions that were once prohibited. There was a reason they were prohibited in the first place and a reason for the forced breakup of large corporations in the past.  

A corporation has all the advantages of a person without the benefit of a conscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A supporting answer from any politician will result in a no vote from me beyond doubt. When you add to it all the students coming out of unis in the next few years, support for this blatent panhandling will come back to bite any politician seeking support from this direction. </p>
<p>Not only will they earn the ire of future voters which might not concern them now, they will earn the ire of those already adult voters that are under the gun along with each victims circle of friends. There are others that will join this group as well. </p>
<p>Those that are in the webmaster business, those in the indies that see these tatics as one of the reasons they can&#8217;t get air time to be heard on the radio, those that are p2pers, even those that consider the now outrageous lengths of copyright as stifling them in producing new technologies and new products for fear of facing some of the penalities that the now sitting legislatures have made making the inventors or manufactors liable will hold the same animosity. </p>
<p>It won&#8217;t do much good to feed at the through if you can&#8217;t get voted in. So make those deals as you will but remember, the American people are fed up with a government that isn&#8217;t listening to anything but corporation and they are considering taking back what is rightfully theirs by way of vote. Its &#8220;for the people by the people&#8221; and those now setting in government are showing no consideration beyond where the next buck is coming from. I personally am ready to see rescinded the ability of the corporation to donate to any one candidate and instead donate to a pool. I am beginning to also favor the removal of person status for the corporation and leave it with no public voice in relation to government by law.</p>
<p>The corporation has purchased it&#8217;s existance and bulled it&#8217;s way into government influance. Through this method, it has now gained back what it lost in the early 20&#8217;s. The broken up Bell corporation has now reformed, no longer being held back by law. Oil companies that were broken up have now merged back into the main 4 players. We have went backwards, not forward with the last generation of lawmakers accepting the bribe to make laws in favor of these actions that were once prohibited. There was a reason they were prohibited in the first place and a reason for the forced breakup of large corporations in the past.  </p>
<p>A corporation has all the advantages of a person without the benefit of a conscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077/comment-page-1#comment-215535</link>
		<dc:creator>X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14077#comment-215535</guid>
		<description>I rather propose a new copyright law in which Artists cannot transfer copyright to a record label. Record Labels do exactly that, record, and nothing else. An artist should be allowed to sell his copyright if he/she should face harsh times, or for some other reasons, but the process should be somewhat tedious to discourage the creation of a market in which creations are traded like you trade stocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rather propose a new copyright law in which Artists cannot transfer copyright to a record label. Record Labels do exactly that, record, and nothing else. An artist should be allowed to sell his copyright if he/she should face harsh times, or for some other reasons, but the process should be somewhat tedious to discourage the creation of a market in which creations are traded like you trade stocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
