p2pnet - rss feed: Leave my sons out of it: Britney Spears
p2pnet news | Music:- Britney Spears can’t put her foot outside her door without being attacked by paparazzi, but she wants to protect protect her two young sons from media exposure.
Sean Preston is two and Jayden James is one.
“An attorney for Britney Spears asked a court commissioner Monday to keep county authorities from reviewing court filings in the pop star’s child custody dispute, saying it would be best for her two young sons,” says Associated Press.
The Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services is a “large bureaucracy with thousands of employees” where the details of the case could easily leak out, argued Thomas Paine Dunlap, states an an attorney for Spears, says AP, adding:
“The department is investigating Spears’ parenting skills.”
Her ex-husband’s lawyer, “argued that if the court turned files over it should identify and release only relevant issues”.
There’s been no further news on rumours that she’s planning on adopting a pair of Chinese twins.
She will, however, have custody of her sons for Christmas Day, says MTV.
Share this >>> 
Also See:
Associated Press - Spears’ Side Wants to Keep Case Sealed, November 26, 2007
MTV - Brit Gets Kids For Xmas, November 27, 2007
Chinese twins - Britney Spears: adopting Chinese twins, November 27, 2007
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for the download, and here for details. Click here or here to learn how to by-pass censorship in your area.
November 27th, 2007 at 8:10 am
What Britney needs is a privacy consultant. With one, she could easily ditch the paparazzi.
November 27th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
She wants the publicity. Her aids regularly tip off the paps.
As the saying goes; any publicity is good publicity. Especially when you are trying to sell (read: licence) music.
November 27th, 2007 at 3:35 pm
The industry can pass all these stupid anti-consumer laws, yet they don’t bother to pass any anti-paparazzi laws. This stuff can be so easily stopped. Forbid the sale of such images taken without ones permission, and penalize anyone who buys and resells said images.
November 27th, 2007 at 5:27 pm
Spike, banning these images violates the U.S. constitution. Besides, banning will only increase the profits.