Comments on: Name expenses-per-download, RIAA ordered http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:47:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219103 Reader's Write Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:02:52 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219103 The Court held that the expense figures are relevant to the issue of whether the RIAA’s attempt to recover damages of $750 or more per 99-cent song file, is an unconstitutional violation of due process.” Its more than that. It is extortion. While the law (becuase it is stupid) may allow the damages of $750, the attept to collect more than 99 cents throught the so called settlement offer letter is patently ilegal and is extortion, considering that the $750 statutory damages can be claimed only in a court of law, not through extortion letters. The Court held that the expense figures are relevant to the issue of whether the RIAA’s attempt to recover damages of $750 or more per 99-cent song file, is an unconstitutional violation of due process.”

Its more than that. It is extortion. While the law (becuase it is stupid) may allow the damages of $750, the attept to collect more than 99 cents throught the so called settlement offer letter is patently ilegal and is extortion, considering that the $750 statutory damages can be claimed only in a court of law, not through extortion letters.

]]> By: WereWolf_nr http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219040 WereWolf_nr Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:03:11 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219040 I second cyberscan's opinion. I second cyberscan’s opinion.

]]> By: cyberscan http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219027 cyberscan Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:39:27 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14136#comment-219027 Hmm, that's strange - A court room judge actually concerned about something being unconstitutional . Hmm, that’s strange - A court room judge actually concerned about something being unconstitutional

.

]]>