Will Yahoo, AOL, drop online radio?
p2pnet news | Music:- Yahoo and Time Warner’s AOL stopped sending people to their radio sites after hard-core Big 4 record label organization SoundExchange started grabbing higher fees in July.
The royalty hikes may, “stifle the growth of Internet radio, which increased listeners 39 percent in the past year,” Bloomberg News has ComScore saying.
Now both companies may shut down their web radio services altogether after being hit with a 38% increase in royalties to air music, says the story.
Radio sites have been “dealt a severe blow,” it has analyst Jeffrey Lindsay stating. “It seems very unlikely that at this stage a solution will be reached.”
SoundExchange, an RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) spin-off, caught in one in payments controversy after another, “represents record companies including Sony BMG, Warner Music Group Corp., and Vivendi SA’s Universal Music Group, sought the royalty increase amid a drop in industry revenue,” says Bloomberg.
“The two sides couldn’t agree on new rates in late 2005, putting the matter before the Copyright Royalty Board, a panel of three judges appointed by the U.S. Copyright Office.
“Siding with the music companies, the board in March ordered that royalties be raised to 0.11 cent for each song listened to from 0.08 cent last year. The rate is scheduled to reach 0.19 cent in 2010.
But, “The current math doesn’t add up,” says Lisa Namerow, managing director of AOL Radio in the story. “If the rates remain as they are, it would be very challenging to sustain a business that is profitable.” The radio sites generate revenue by selling advertising.
Meanwhile, according to Bloomberg, Yahoo and AOL are hoping to “wrest a reduction in the royalties” in discussions with SoundExchange, which has offered lower fees to smaller Internet radio sites.
“The major Webcasters are represented in the talks by the Washington-based Digital Media Association, which also has asked the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington to overturn the royalty board,” says the story, adding:
“Congress may be the last resort for the Webcasters. Bills introduced in the House by Democratic Representative Jay Inslee of Washington and in the Senate by Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon would repeal the royalty increases.
Democratic Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts said in July that Congress may act if a compromise isn’t reached.”
Also See:
Bloomberg News - Yahoo, AOL May Abandon Web Radio After Royalties Rise, November 28, 2007
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for the download, and here for details. Click here or here to learn how to by-pass censorship in your area.
November 29th, 2007 at 10:42 am
Since the internet radio (and terrestrial radio) are just ‘distributing and promoting’, the RIAA’s ‘product’, much like the RIAA is doing for it’s ‘content providers’, why don’t the radio stations get to have a deal similar to what the RIAA has with it’s ‘content provider’?
I mean I keep reading about how $0.50 from a $15 album goes to the artist ($20 if it’s ‘older stock’). So why doesn’t the RIAA get paid 0.5/15 of the profit from a song. There are ~30412800 seconds in a year. So for a 3minute song (180 seconds), that would be 180/30412800* 0.5/15 = 1/5068800*income (hmm gross or net?)
(Someone check my math,eh).
So for the 0.11 to stand, the radio company would have to make 557,568 in those 3 minutes.
Ok. I know I went to the extremes a little bit. Let’s go the other extreme. We’d have to reduce the time to actual play time (i.e. say radio is 1/3 music 2/3 talk/commercials), and the $0.50/$15 may have changed (hahahaha, damn that’s funny).
Lets assume $1/$15 is paid to the ‘content provider’ and use the 1/3 music to calculate the payout. 30412800 becomes 10137600 and we have 180/10137600*1/15 = 1/844800 and for it to be 0.11 per song, it’d need to be
Using this and the $0.11 per song the radio station would need to make, $92,928 in 3 minutes.
Hey, if it’s fair for the RIAA to do it to the ‘content providers’ (the artists), is it not fair for the radio stations to do it to their ‘content providers’ (the RIAA)?