Making $92,928 in 3 minutes
p2pnet news | Music:- Here’s an interesting Reader’s Write on the possibility that Yahoo and AOL may give up the ghost as far as online radio is concerned.
“Since the internet radio (and terrestrial radio) are just ‘distributing and promoting’, the RIAA’s ‘product’, much like the RIAA is doing for it’s ‘content providers’, why don’t the radio stations get to have a deal similar to what the RIAA has with it’s ‘content provider’?” – it asks, going on:
I mean I keep reading about how $0.50 from a $15 album goes to the artist ($20 if it’s ‘older stock’). So why doesn’t the RIAA get paid 0.5/15 of the profit from a song. There are ~30412800 seconds in a year. So for a 3minute song (180 seconds), that would be 180/30412800* 0.5/15 = 1/5068800*income (hmm gross or net?)
(Someone check my math, eh).
So for the 0.11 to stand, the radio company would have to make 557,568 in those 3 minutes.
Ok. I know I went to the extremes a little bit. Let’s go the other extreme. We’d have to reduce the time to actual play time (i.e. say radio is 1/3 music 2/3 talk/commercials), and the $0.50/$15 may have changed (hahahaha, damn that’s funny).
Let’s assume $1/$15 is paid to the ‘content provider’ and use the 1/3 music to calculate the payout. 30412800 becomes 10137600 and we have 180/10137600*1/15 = 1/844800 and for it to be 0.11 per song, it’d need to be
Using this and the $0.11 per song the radio station would need to make, $92,928 in 3 minutes.
Hey, if it’s fair for the RIAA to do it to the ‘content providers’ (the artists), is it not fair for the radio stations to do it to their ‘content providers’ (the RIAA)?
Good one
Also See:
give up the ghost – Will Yahoo, AOL, drop online radio?, November 29, 2007
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for the download, and here for details. Click here or here to learn how to by-pass censorship in your area.







November 29th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
This seems to be written too poorly to really make a lot of sense. I know what is being said, but it’s really bouncy. Clarify?
December 1st, 2007 at 8:06 pm
i don’t understand a thing.
he lost me at “~30412800 seconds in a year”.