Comments on: WIPO, ifpi.com and The Pirate Bay http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:01:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: The Angry Offender http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-227704 The Angry Offender Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:20:47 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-227704 This reminds me of how Nissan Motor Co. tried to use courts to steal nissan.com from the guy who got it first for his business, Nissan Computers. This reminds me of how Nissan Motor Co. tried to use courts to steal nissan.com from the guy who got it first for his business, Nissan Computers.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-224960 Reader's Write Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:44:22 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-224960 Oh well, at least they had fun getting under the IFPI's skin. Oh well, at least they had fun getting under the IFPI’s skin.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223293 Reader's Write Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:31:53 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223293 Would like to add: If i was the guy that gave TPB the domain, id complain to WIPO and try to get it back. Would like to add: If i was the guy that gave TPB the domain, id complain to WIPO and try to get it back.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223286 Reader's Write Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:26:47 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223286 the full letter looked realy wierd tbh, TPB do have an organisation called IFPI, yet it was ignored and stated they did not and he recieved the letter late so he couldnt complain lol.. WIPO got paid for the domain, if anything the one who gave away the domain should have gotten it back, International Federation of Phonographic Industry should not have gotten it, they never owned it! it was given to TPB, TPB wasnt allowed to use it so a 3rd actor gets the domain for free because it has a organisation called IFPI? Witch TPB also had but apparently not had according to WIPO? LOL.. if TPB was not allowed to use it because they didnt have any organisation called IFPI even though they do then the domain should have been handed back to the previous original owner, the guy who donated the domain to TPB. the full letter looked realy wierd tbh, TPB do have an organisation called IFPI, yet it was ignored and stated they did not and he recieved the letter late so he couldnt complain lol.. WIPO got paid for the domain, if anything the one who gave away the domain should have gotten it back, International Federation of Phonographic Industry should not have gotten it, they never owned it! it was given to TPB, TPB wasnt allowed to use it so a 3rd actor gets the domain for free because it has a organisation called IFPI? Witch TPB also had but apparently not had according to WIPO? LOL..

if TPB was not allowed to use it because they didnt have any organisation called IFPI even though they do then the domain should have been handed back to the previous original owner, the guy who donated the domain to TPB.

]]> By: onion http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223271 onion Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:10:59 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14187#comment-223271 in other words? what the hell is this? in other words? what the hell is this?

]]>