Paris Hilton — pain reliever
p2pnet news | TV:- At last, someone has found a way to make Paris Hilton do something useful.
And you can thank Canadian researcher Jeffrey Mogil. He’s been examining various forms of pain relief.
The E.P. Taylor Chair in Pain Studies at McGill University in Montreal, Mogil has been “bringing a variety of sophisticated techniques to bear on the problem,” as he posts on his webpage.
He’s discovered Rats confronted with a cardboard Hilton cut-out apparently have less pain than others.
Not only but also, male rats are more likely to experience the Hilton effect and females.
Why’s that?
Mogil and his colleagues, “noticed that male mice spent less time licking the site of a painful injection–indicating that they had less pain–when a scientist was present,” says Science.
To find out if it was the sight or smell of a human which was responsible, the researchers bought a promotional cardboard cut-out of Hilton from her TV show The Simple Life —- “A special order,” the story has says Mogil collaborator Leigh MacIntyre saying.
And, “As in humans, Paris’s effect appears to be gender-specific,” says Science, adding:
“Male mice spent less time licking their wounds when fake Paris was in sight, but females showed no such effect, and
Mogil suspects the analgesic effect has something to do with stress.”
Meanwhile, “the effect of a Paris Hilton video on male mice has yet to be studied.”
Says Mogil’s site:
“Mogil made headlines around the world a few years ago when he published research that showed that red-headed women respond to a specific kind of painkiller better than their blonde or brunette brothers and sisters, due to a single gene that plays a role in both hair colour and analgesia.”
There you go ……
(Thanks, Emma 
)
Also See:
Science – Stress, Pain, and Paris Hilton, November 5, 2007
Want to help p2pnet stay online? Please click here.
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for the download, and here for details. Click here or here to learn how to by-pass censorship in your area.
December 3rd, 2007 at 10:17 am
Another great picture. As I have said before one day you should do a special with some of your pics
March 3rd, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Can I add something here?
The idea for the unconventional experiment arose when Jeffrey Mogil of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and his colleagues noticed that male mice spent less time licking the site of a painful injection–indicating that they had less pain–when a scientist was present. To investigate whether it was the sight or smell of a human that caused the effect, the researchers acquired a promotional cardboard cutout of Hilton from her television show The Simple Life (”A special order,” says Mogil’s collaborator Leigh MacIntyre).
As in humans, Paris’s effect appears to be gender-specific. Male mice spent less time licking their wounds when fake Paris was in sight, but females showed no such effect, the researchers reported here Saturday at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience. When the team put up a screen to block the rodents’ view, the effect went away. Following a Paris Hilton encounter, male mice–but not females–also had lower-than-usual expression of a gene called c-fos in a part of the spinal cord that transmits pain signals to the brain, suggesting reduced neural activity in this pain pathway.
Mogil suspects the analgesic effect has something to do with stress. He notes that other researchers have reported that stress can reduce pain in laboratory rodents exposed to cats or cat odors. (If a predator lurks nearby, taking time to lick your wounds may not be the best idea.) Mice probably see humans as potential predators, Mogil says, and for some reason, males stress out about it more than females do. Indeed, in another presentation Saturday, Tara Perrot-Sinal of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Canada, reported that a 60-minute exposure to a well-worn cat collar boosted levels of the stress hormone corticosterone in male rats but not in females.
The findings add to a growing body of evidence that males and females respond differently to stressors, says neuroscientist Rebecca Craft of Washington State University in Pullman. The work also offers a note of caution for researchers who study sex differences in a variety of behaviors, Craft says: “If you’re comparing males and females in your experiment, you may be measuring sex differences in stress responses rather than, or in addition to, what you think you’re measuring.” Meanwhile, the effect of a Paris Hilton video on male mice has yet to be studied.