Comments on: Hollywood’s MPAA — copyright violator http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208/comment-page-1#comment-227626 Reader's Write Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:51:05 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208#comment-227626 "YES! By all means he should take the MPAA to court over this." ...and use the same judges that Jammie got. “YES! By all means he should take the MPAA to court over this.”

…and use the same judges that Jammie got.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208/comment-page-1#comment-227078 Reader's Write Wed, 05 Dec 2007 05:30:35 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208#comment-227078 Over and over again we see the copyright enforcers attempt to take the high road of moral unrighteousnesses. It's a non-stop, the pirates are to blame. Yet when software comes out it is unusable because of lack of foresight, such as the software to find infringing files that turned out to be nothing more than a search for *.mp3, *.avi, or wma, which every one has one their computer. Windows comes with sample files and operating files as well as games. The software did not discriminate, it would get it all, including the sound files needed to operate sound on the OS. Then there was the sorry saga of the special player needed to play the sound. Needless, open source library files were used in the player, yet no credit at all given, no source code, no nothing. Yet like the RIAA, they are interested in preventing piracy. This just goes to show as always, it is do as I say, not as I do. We have a member here that has often made the statement that he was ripped off by the labels for his father's songs. But it's just biz when it comes to the bucks. If they can pass off something to you to steal your data, break your privacy rights, crap even down to hiring a hacker to crack emails, all is good. Most of this is stuff that the RIAA and cohorts did. Still you can ready see the same brush paints true. It's alright for the majors of both music and movie to rip off copyright without paying any attention to a license. It's ok of the kids of the father does so, as he will give them a non-discussed punishment. I wonder how Tanya would like the same instead of the mockery that she was dragged through in court? Every software issued now, has to be checked if it comes from the holders of copyright. As usual the typical excuse is we pay for the item to be made, it's third party. Third party didn't put it on the net. Third party is not responsible for the commissioning of such works. Yet when a license is infringed on their side, they are just testing software. Or we didn't know that was there. Yet when it comes down to showing them, talking to them about it, you get the huge run-a-round. Wonder how they would like that in Washington? It's high time they got such. Over and over again we see the copyright enforcers attempt to take the high road of moral unrighteousnesses. It’s a non-stop, the pirates are to blame. Yet when software comes out it is unusable because of lack of foresight, such as the software to find infringing files that turned out to be nothing more than a search for *.mp3, *.avi, or wma, which every one has one their computer. Windows comes with sample files and operating files as well as games. The software did not discriminate, it would get it all, including the sound files needed to operate sound on the OS.

Then there was the sorry saga of the special player needed to play the sound. Needless, open source library files were used in the player, yet no credit at all given, no source code, no nothing. Yet like the RIAA, they are interested in preventing piracy.

This just goes to show as always, it is do as I say, not as I do. We have a member here that has often made the statement that he was ripped off by the labels for his father’s songs. But it’s just biz when it comes to the bucks.

If they can pass off something to you to steal your data, break your privacy rights, crap even down to hiring a hacker to crack emails, all is good. Most of this is stuff that the RIAA and cohorts did. Still you can ready see the same brush paints true. It’s alright for the majors of both music and movie to rip off copyright without paying any attention to a license. It’s ok of the kids of the father does so, as he will give them a non-discussed punishment. I wonder how Tanya would like the same instead of the mockery that she was dragged through in court?

Every software issued now, has to be checked if it comes from the holders of copyright. As usual the typical excuse is we pay for the item to be made, it’s third party. Third party didn’t put it on the net. Third party is not responsible for the commissioning of such works. Yet when a license is infringed on their side, they are just testing software. Or we didn’t know that was there. Yet when it comes down to showing them, talking to them about it, you get the huge run-a-round. Wonder how they would like that in Washington? It’s high time they got such.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208/comment-page-1#comment-226370 Reader's Write Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:38:55 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14208#comment-226370 YES! By all means he should take the MPAA to court over this. What's good for the goose... YES! By all means he should take the MPAA to court over this.

What’s good for the goose…

]]>