<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian DMCA REALLY SUCKS!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jugger</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247/comment-page-1#comment-228581</link>
		<dc:creator>jugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247#comment-228581</guid>
		<description>Finally, this week is the likely the week that the Canadian version of the DMCA, Digital Millenium Copyright Act, is to be tabled. In it, the copyright provisions are so strenuous, if you were to purchase a cd for the full-price from a legitimate retailer, rip it on your computer unshared with anyone, put it on your mp3 player to listen to, you will have committed heinous, egregious copyright infringement. You owe the company who sold you the cd serious money. You&#039;ll just have to purchase a copy for your mp3 player, a copy for your stereo and a copy for your phone. If your OS requires software updates that don&#039;t recognize your legally purchased file, you&#039;d better buy another copy, or suffer the consequences of white collar criminals everywhere. You also can&#039;t unlock something to find out how it works, or record a television show in order to watch it later.

-----

Industry Minister Jim Prentice will rise in the House of Commons and introduce copyright reform legislation.  We can no longer speak of choices because those choices have already been made.  There is every indication (see the Globe&#039;s latest coverage) this legislation will be a complete sell-out to U.S. government and lobbyist demands.  The industry may be abandoning DRM, the evidence may show a correlation between file sharing and music purchasing, Statistics Canada may say that music industry profits are doing fine, Canadian musicians, filmmakers, and artists may warn against this copyright approach, and the reality may be that Canadian copyright law is stronger in some areas than U.S. law, yet none of that seems to matter.  In the current environment and with the current Ministers, politics trumps policy. 

The new Canadian legislation will likely mirror the DMCA with strong anti-circumvention legislation - far beyond what is needed to comply with the WIPO Internet treaties - and address none of the issues that concern millions of Canadians.  The Conservatives promise to eliminate the private copying levy will likely be abandoned.  There will be no flexible fair dealing.  No parody exception. No time shifting exception.  No device shifting exception.  No expanded backup provision. Nothing. 

The government will seemingly choose locks over learning, property over privacy, enforcement over education, (law)suits over security, lobbyists over librarians, and U.S. policy over a &quot;Canadian-made&quot; solution.  Once the bill is introduced, look for the government to put it on the fast track with limited opportunity for Canadians to appear before committees considering the bill. With a Canadian DMCA imminent, what matters now are voices. It will be up to those opposed to this law to make theirs heard.

Update: Many people have asked what they can do to make their voices heard on this issue. Last year, I posted 30 Things You Can Do about anti-circumvention legislation.  Many of those recommendations still apply, starting with a letter (letter, not email - no stamp required) to your Member of Parliament, the Ministers of Industry and Canadian Heritage, and the Prime Minister.

From http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2419/125/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, this week is the likely the week that the Canadian version of the DMCA, Digital Millenium Copyright Act, is to be tabled. In it, the copyright provisions are so strenuous, if you were to purchase a cd for the full-price from a legitimate retailer, rip it on your computer unshared with anyone, put it on your mp3 player to listen to, you will have committed heinous, egregious copyright infringement. You owe the company who sold you the cd serious money. You&#8217;ll just have to purchase a copy for your mp3 player, a copy for your stereo and a copy for your phone. If your OS requires software updates that don&#8217;t recognize your legally purchased file, you&#8217;d better buy another copy, or suffer the consequences of white collar criminals everywhere. You also can&#8217;t unlock something to find out how it works, or record a television show in order to watch it later.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Industry Minister Jim Prentice will rise in the House of Commons and introduce copyright reform legislation.  We can no longer speak of choices because those choices have already been made.  There is every indication (see the Globe&#8217;s latest coverage) this legislation will be a complete sell-out to U.S. government and lobbyist demands.  The industry may be abandoning DRM, the evidence may show a correlation between file sharing and music purchasing, Statistics Canada may say that music industry profits are doing fine, Canadian musicians, filmmakers, and artists may warn against this copyright approach, and the reality may be that Canadian copyright law is stronger in some areas than U.S. law, yet none of that seems to matter.  In the current environment and with the current Ministers, politics trumps policy. </p>
<p>The new Canadian legislation will likely mirror the DMCA with strong anti-circumvention legislation &#8211; far beyond what is needed to comply with the WIPO Internet treaties &#8211; and address none of the issues that concern millions of Canadians.  The Conservatives promise to eliminate the private copying levy will likely be abandoned.  There will be no flexible fair dealing.  No parody exception. No time shifting exception.  No device shifting exception.  No expanded backup provision. Nothing. </p>
<p>The government will seemingly choose locks over learning, property over privacy, enforcement over education, (law)suits over security, lobbyists over librarians, and U.S. policy over a &#8220;Canadian-made&#8221; solution.  Once the bill is introduced, look for the government to put it on the fast track with limited opportunity for Canadians to appear before committees considering the bill. With a Canadian DMCA imminent, what matters now are voices. It will be up to those opposed to this law to make theirs heard.</p>
<p>Update: Many people have asked what they can do to make their voices heard on this issue. Last year, I posted 30 Things You Can Do about anti-circumvention legislation.  Many of those recommendations still apply, starting with a letter (letter, not email &#8211; no stamp required) to your Member of Parliament, the Ministers of Industry and Canadian Heritage, and the Prime Minister.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2419/125/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/2419/125/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TTFD</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247/comment-page-1#comment-228580</link>
		<dc:creator>TTFD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247#comment-228580</guid>
		<description>This is beyond appalling. I have written my MP Peggy Nash, although she seems to be going for the NO vote regardless. For this government to consult with a foreign ambassador and mainly foreign business entities while failing to consult the citizens he represents and work for is insulting and undemocratic. This is not what Canada stands for, if Dion wants to make this a battle of ideologies, a US ideology vs a Canadian one for the upcoming election this is a perfect flash-point. I will be writing his office as well encouraging him to stand up for Canadian sovereignty and not for multi-national corporations or foreign governments when considering Canadian law and policy.  
 
I refuse to let my country take that first step down the this slippery slope, we&#039;ve seen the evidence of this type of approach south of the border, it&#039;s an unmitigated failure, which is even admitted by the one of the original architects of the US DMCA... 
 
So to recap, we&#039;ll adopt a failed US law here in Canada instead of a well thought out Canadian solution, and then after ramming this legislation through under cover of Christmas (despicable US style politics) we as citizens of this country will have the opportunity to have out voices heard after the fact to try and repair the wrong(s) that have been done? This is ridiculous, governing backwards from a manufactured problem to a solution, in upwards of 10 years?!?! This government is not my government, this government is NOT Canadian at all. Get them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is beyond appalling. I have written my MP Peggy Nash, although she seems to be going for the NO vote regardless. For this government to consult with a foreign ambassador and mainly foreign business entities while failing to consult the citizens he represents and work for is insulting and undemocratic. This is not what Canada stands for, if Dion wants to make this a battle of ideologies, a US ideology vs a Canadian one for the upcoming election this is a perfect flash-point. I will be writing his office as well encouraging him to stand up for Canadian sovereignty and not for multi-national corporations or foreign governments when considering Canadian law and policy.  </p>
<p>I refuse to let my country take that first step down the this slippery slope, we&#8217;ve seen the evidence of this type of approach south of the border, it&#8217;s an unmitigated failure, which is even admitted by the one of the original architects of the US DMCA&#8230; </p>
<p>So to recap, we&#8217;ll adopt a failed US law here in Canada instead of a well thought out Canadian solution, and then after ramming this legislation through under cover of Christmas (despicable US style politics) we as citizens of this country will have the opportunity to have out voices heard after the fact to try and repair the wrong(s) that have been done? This is ridiculous, governing backwards from a manufactured problem to a solution, in upwards of 10 years?!?! This government is not my government, this government is NOT Canadian at all. Get them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dreddsnik</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247/comment-page-1#comment-228394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dreddsnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247#comment-228394</guid>
		<description>&quot; this video sucks! &quot;

 That may be so, 
 but at least they are DOING something.
 TRYING to make a difference.

 Kudos for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; this video sucks! &#8221;</p>
<p> That may be so,<br />
 but at least they are DOING something.<br />
 TRYING to make a difference.</p>
<p> Kudos for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catflap</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247/comment-page-1#comment-228364</link>
		<dc:creator>catflap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14247#comment-228364</guid>
		<description>this video sucks!

I MEAN...IT REALLY, REALLY, TOTALLY SUCKS...eh!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this video sucks!</p>
<p>I MEAN&#8230;IT REALLY, REALLY, TOTALLY SUCKS&#8230;eh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
