<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: exposing kids to porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-995809</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-995809</guid>
		<description>To &quot;The Angry Offender&quot;, you could not have said it better.  When are parents going to start being parents again and set the rules around the house and control the kids, not the kids control the parents.  I do not need the government to tell me how to run my family and what is and is not appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;The Angry Offender&#8221;, you could not have said it better.  When are parents going to start being parents again and set the rules around the house and control the kids, not the kids control the parents.  I do not need the government to tell me how to run my family and what is and is not appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Offender</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-234046</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 03:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-234046</guid>
		<description>BOTTOM LINE: It&#039;s the damned parents&#039; job to supervise their offspring while using the Internet, and if they can&#039;t do that simple thing, they shouldn&#039;t have had kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOTTOM LINE: It&#8217;s the damned parents&#8217; job to supervise their offspring while using the Internet, and if they can&#8217;t do that simple thing, they shouldn&#8217;t have had kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231746</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231746</guid>
		<description>Because little johnny got caught looking at pron and now he&#039;s scarred for life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because little johnny got caught looking at pron and now he&#8217;s scarred for life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231709</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231709</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t google have a filter for image searches that you have to turn off?  They day they make me give them a credit card to change that setting is the day I quit using google.  Seriously why do these people make crap up and then go on the warpath?  Must want his name in the news or something...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t google have a filter for image searches that you have to turn off?  They day they make me give them a credit card to change that setting is the day I quit using google.  Seriously why do these people make crap up and then go on the warpath?  Must want his name in the news or something&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Angry Offender</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231428</link>
		<dc:creator>The Angry Offender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231428</guid>
		<description>Wake up, people.  This is how freedom is destroyed.  We start making distinctions between &quot;good&quot; speech and &quot;bad&quot; speech, and the &quot;bad&quot; speech category being legally infringed upon is the tip of the crowbar pushing through the door.  Demanding that Google, which is basically a giant indexing robot, be blocked for reporting unbiased results from its indexing that happen to show what SOME PEOPLE consider to be objectionable content is absurd.

Let&#039;s take a ride down the slippery slope.  Consider the methods by which children (or teens) can be prevented from viewing &quot;objectionable content&quot; online.  The perfect way to do it?  No more Internet, period.  The next less drastic step?  Massive oversight of the entire Internet, requiring that all content be published through, say, a government entity, and even then there is no guarantee that objectionable content won&#039;t be published.  Next we would have designated third parties that do the regulation management instead of the government, which opens more holes for bad content but makes it somewhat easier to publish content.  Now keep following this inverse traversal of the slippery slope we&#039;re on, and where are we?  We&#039;re at the part where some assclown can come along and demand that an ISP *VIA GOVERNMENT ORDER* block out some form of content because &quot;kids might see something bad.&quot;  Granted, they trump up the &quot;threat&quot; by using typical lawyer exaggeration such as &quot;systematically committed felonies&quot; and &quot;horrible breaches.&quot;  That&#039;s not too terrible yet, but how far does it have to go before someone stands up and says &quot;to hell with this censorship?&quot;  Don&#039;t people have a right to self-censor?  If someone sees that Google is spitting out porn to their kids, don&#039;t they have the right to take measures to keep them off of it and have them use other search engines?  Why is it that governmental bodies are parenting the general population more and more as time goes on?

Have we really degraded to the point that we can&#039;t make decisions for ourselves?  Or is it that some people wish to exact their individual morality and beliefs upon others, using the government as the tool to bring about that goal of fascism?

I wasn&#039;t aware that a government would &quot;blacklist&quot; websites; it seems that the free market is the place for such &quot;blacklisting&quot; to take place to me.  But then again maybe not, since governments have proven for centuries that they can surely manage things better than the private sector, like healthcare.  Yep, government-run healthcare makes free market healthcare look like a joke, especially since the government-run healthcare doesn&#039;t have waiting lists and rationing out of live-saving operations.  Oh, wait...

(Remember who said &quot;the government that governs least, governs best?&quot;  Hmmm?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up, people.  This is how freedom is destroyed.  We start making distinctions between &#8220;good&#8221; speech and &#8220;bad&#8221; speech, and the &#8220;bad&#8221; speech category being legally infringed upon is the tip of the crowbar pushing through the door.  Demanding that Google, which is basically a giant indexing robot, be blocked for reporting unbiased results from its indexing that happen to show what SOME PEOPLE consider to be objectionable content is absurd.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a ride down the slippery slope.  Consider the methods by which children (or teens) can be prevented from viewing &#8220;objectionable content&#8221; online.  The perfect way to do it?  No more Internet, period.  The next less drastic step?  Massive oversight of the entire Internet, requiring that all content be published through, say, a government entity, and even then there is no guarantee that objectionable content won&#8217;t be published.  Next we would have designated third parties that do the regulation management instead of the government, which opens more holes for bad content but makes it somewhat easier to publish content.  Now keep following this inverse traversal of the slippery slope we&#8217;re on, and where are we?  We&#8217;re at the part where some assclown can come along and demand that an ISP *VIA GOVERNMENT ORDER* block out some form of content because &#8220;kids might see something bad.&#8221;  Granted, they trump up the &#8220;threat&#8221; by using typical lawyer exaggeration such as &#8220;systematically committed felonies&#8221; and &#8220;horrible breaches.&#8221;  That&#8217;s not too terrible yet, but how far does it have to go before someone stands up and says &#8220;to hell with this censorship?&#8221;  Don&#8217;t people have a right to self-censor?  If someone sees that Google is spitting out porn to their kids, don&#8217;t they have the right to take measures to keep them off of it and have them use other search engines?  Why is it that governmental bodies are parenting the general population more and more as time goes on?</p>
<p>Have we really degraded to the point that we can&#8217;t make decisions for ourselves?  Or is it that some people wish to exact their individual morality and beliefs upon others, using the government as the tool to bring about that goal of fascism?</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware that a government would &#8220;blacklist&#8221; websites; it seems that the free market is the place for such &#8220;blacklisting&#8221; to take place to me.  But then again maybe not, since governments have proven for centuries that they can surely manage things better than the private sector, like healthcare.  Yep, government-run healthcare makes free market healthcare look like a joke, especially since the government-run healthcare doesn&#8217;t have waiting lists and rationing out of live-saving operations.  Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
<p>(Remember who said &#8220;the government that governs least, governs best?&#8221;  Hmmm?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231420</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231420</guid>
		<description>Google already provides filtering options. Parents who are concerned should take responsibility and use that filtering.  Blaming google for all the worlds problems is narrow minded and naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google already provides filtering options. Parents who are concerned should take responsibility and use that filtering.  Blaming google for all the worlds problems is narrow minded and naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231345</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231345</guid>
		<description>Look, when I was a kid I looked up new rude words in the dictionary; so sure, if I&#039;d had google, that&#039;s the very first thing I&#039;d do. But is it up to google to do the censorship? I don&#039;t really think so. Of course, if they want to follow the &quot;do no evil&quot; mantra, they could supply parents with an applet to disable unsuitable hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, when I was a kid I looked up new rude words in the dictionary; so sure, if I&#8217;d had google, that&#8217;s the very first thing I&#8217;d do. But is it up to google to do the censorship? I don&#8217;t really think so. Of course, if they want to follow the &#8220;do no evil&#8221; mantra, they could supply parents with an applet to disable unsuitable hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231281</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231281</guid>
		<description>They will go out and stab someone.  Stop this travesty before another columbine happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will go out and stab someone.  Stop this travesty before another columbine happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: confused mom</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283/comment-page-1#comment-231272</link>
		<dc:creator>confused mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14283#comment-231272</guid>
		<description>will young kids who see those pictures really understand what its about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will young kids who see those pictures really understand what its about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


