Comments on: Gibson’s Passion: Number One http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1429 p2pnet.net - reader powered Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1429/comment-page-1#comment-1961 Reader's Write Sat, 15 May 2004 20:05:00 +0000 #comment-1961 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1429/comment-page-1#comment-1842 Reader's Write Thu, 13 May 2004 21:23:25 +0000 #comment-1842 "though I have given out some free copies" So instead of just ignoring it and not giving it more attention you have illegally d/l'd it, adding fuel to the movie companies fires to go after people like you and have helped spread Mel's interpretation to more people. Good call. “though I have given out some free copies”

So instead of just ignoring it and not giving it more attention you have illegally d/l’d it, adding fuel to the movie companies fires to go after people like you and have helped spread Mel’s interpretation to more people.

Good call.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1429/comment-page-1#comment-1828 Reader's Write Thu, 13 May 2004 02:16:22 +0000 #comment-1828 I'll be the first one to admit that I downloaded the Passion as soon as I could. Frankly I think that a lot of people were curious about the film but didn't want to pay for it either out of concern over becoming sick from the gratuitous blood and gore or out of philisophical disagreements with the content. I haven't watched the damn thing yet...though I have given out some free copies just to deprive Mel of some box office reciepts. I did this simply as a means of showing my contempt for the claim that an interpretation of an interpretation of an event that may not have occurred was historical truth and true to religious teachings. Sorry, even if we are to assume that the bible is a historical account, that does not mean that Gibson's personal interpretation of the gospels, which vary from one another, can be presented as the new truth for religion. That and all the presentations of Jews as demons. Didn't care for that much either. I’ll be the first one to admit that I downloaded the Passion as soon as I could. Frankly I think that a lot of people were curious about the film but didn’t want to pay for it either out of concern over becoming sick from the gratuitous blood and gore or out of philisophical disagreements with the content. I haven’t watched the damn thing yet…though I have given out some free copies just to deprive Mel of some box office reciepts. I did this simply as a means of showing my contempt for the claim that an interpretation of an interpretation of an event that may not have occurred was historical truth and true to religious teachings. Sorry, even if we are to assume that the bible is a historical account, that does not mean that Gibson’s personal interpretation of the gospels, which vary from one another, can be presented as the new truth for religion. That and all the presentations of Jews as demons. Didn’t care for that much either.

]]>