<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scrabbling for Scrabulous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682/comment-page-1#comment-281286</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682#comment-281286</guid>
		<description>Scrabble was re-Invented in 1931. Did the copyright expired by now even on this claim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrabble was re-Invented in 1931. Did the copyright expired by now even on this claim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682/comment-page-1#comment-281283</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682#comment-281283</guid>
		<description>The world Scrabble was trademarked in 1948. So may be HAsbro can claim tradmark infringement because Scrabulous is related to Scrabble although it is fare fetched. But the game itself is just a crossworld puzzle. and even the idea of having amovible letters has many prior arts as fare as the 19th century at least! I will no be surprised if we can find some even older prior art for that. At most just change the game name to something else and continue to play!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world Scrabble was trademarked in 1948. So may be HAsbro can claim tradmark infringement because Scrabulous is related to Scrabble although it is fare fetched. But the game itself is just a crossworld puzzle. and even the idea of having amovible letters has many prior arts as fare as the 19th century at least! I will no be surprised if we can find some even older prior art for that. At most just change the game name to something else and continue to play!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682/comment-page-1#comment-281275</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682#comment-281275</guid>
		<description>Scrable is just a crossword puzzle renamed scrabble. So how can Masbro/Matel claim copyright on this?
A lot of people have been using cut letters from news papers to be able to reuse their crossworld puzles well before they show up with this so called &quot;Scrabble&quot;. 

Soldiers in world war I were playing this games in the tranches and sailors too during the 19th century! Where is the novelty in this game?  

Let&#039;s get ride of this bogus copyright claim once and for all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scrable is just a crossword puzzle renamed scrabble. So how can Masbro/Matel claim copyright on this?<br />
A lot of people have been using cut letters from news papers to be able to reuse their crossworld puzles well before they show up with this so called &#8220;Scrabble&#8221;. </p>
<p>Soldiers in world war I were playing this games in the tranches and sailors too during the 19th century! Where is the novelty in this game?  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get ride of this bogus copyright claim once and for all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682/comment-page-1#comment-281131</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14682#comment-281131</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really see how they can claim ownership over a game where all you do is form words out of randomly selected letters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see how they can claim ownership over a game where all you do is form words out of randomly selected letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


