Comments on: New win for Tanya Andersen against RIAA

By: me

me — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:14:57 +0000

It is about time a Judge realized that just because they own an INTERNET account doesn’t mean they did anything wrong.
Up to this point, many, many people have been falsely sued for having downloaded when they never sat behind the desk.
The RIAA felt that if you own a gun, you must have been responsible for the murder. If you own a car, you must have been driving when the hit and run occurred.
Worse, the DOj and courts adopted this belief that no proof of any wrong doing still made you guilty.
We saw that in Iraq but now it has been present in 20,000 federal cases in the US.
Nice to see that for someone to have been found guilty, there will now have to be proof that a person did some thing wrong no thinks to the Justice department
and many other federal judges.

By: RIAA rep

RIAA rep — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:47:31 +0000

This is a bad day for piracy. It’s troublemakers like this Tanya Andersen stealing all our content that should be going to jail for a long time, let alone some piddly little $4000 fine. Stupid judge.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:53:22 +0000

Congrats.

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 18 Jan 2008 01:37:30 +0000

Very intelligent judge, looking at insert from ruling posted here.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:07:40 +0000

It’s about time Tanya got some satisfaction for all the crap this group has put her through. It looks to have been one thing on the mind of the RIAA, to try and show to others on the hit list that fighting in court is going to cost you. But then caving in will as well.

Only this time it has backfired in a big way. How nice to see some justice served up for the little guy. WTG Tanya and company!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:27:07 +0000

Pay up suckers (RIAA)