<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ontario&#8217;s largest kiddie porn sweep</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14943</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14943#comment-318506</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14943#comment-318506</guid>
		<description>“Since IPs may change a few times a year, Waters’ data has been corrected for possible duplication."

Which is more than the RIAA/MPAA are doing to avoid targeting people who have never downloaded anything in their lives.  Knowing full well that the IP address you're using today could be used by a sexual predator, hacker, or "massive online distributor" of copyrighted material months from now, using a randomly generated number to fingerprint anonymous internet users is a horribly pathetic way of policing the internet, and is prone to a huge risk of prosecuting the wrong people.  Using someone's IP address as evidence against them is the most unreliable tactic ever conceived, and means absolutely fuck all without any real evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Since IPs may change a few times a year, Waters’ data has been corrected for possible duplication.&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is more than the RIAA/MPAA are doing to avoid targeting people who have never downloaded anything in their lives.  Knowing full well that the IP address you&#8217;re using today could be used by a sexual predator, hacker, or &#8220;massive online distributor&#8221; of copyrighted material months from now, using a randomly generated number to fingerprint anonymous internet users is a horribly pathetic way of policing the internet, and is prone to a huge risk of prosecuting the wrong people.  Using someone&#8217;s IP address as evidence against them is the most unreliable tactic ever conceived, and means absolutely fuck all without any real evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14943#comment-318038</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14943#comment-318038</guid>
		<description>"serial numbers"

O RLY?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;serial numbers&#8221;</p>
<p>O RLY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
