<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loose Lips, blogs and the USAF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103/comment-page-1#comment-343748</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103#comment-343748</guid>
		<description>Good Grief, this story or the issue of Air Force blocking blogs just made it to the Coast Guard end of the blogosphere.  At our end of internet, we have not all been blocked as of yet, but rumblings inside Coast Guard Headquarters point in that direction.   We have uncovered what has been labeled the âugly underbellyâ of the Coast Guard and report on issues they sooner not have discussed.  Of the three main blogs, CoastGuardReport.org,  and two others we take on issues that otherwise would not be discussed at the level and with the sources inside the Coast Guard we use.
As the Coast Guard tries to come to grips with its new and increased missions since 911, along with its increased funding, we have much to report on.  From the failed 27 billion dollar acquisition portfolio to upgrade the Coast Guardâs aged and deteriorating fleet of ships and aircraft, to a base infrastructure that is largely made up of base hand-me-downs from the other services, they have much to do.  Coast Guards 27 billion dollar acquisition portfolio is still being managed today by an Admiral with ZERO professional acquisition training, qualifications or certifications.  Why the congress let alone the Commandant of the Coast Guard donât tackle that easy fix is beyond anything anyone outside the Coast Guard can fathom.
Good Luck Bloggers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Grief, this story or the issue of Air Force blocking blogs just made it to the Coast Guard end of the blogosphere.  At our end of internet, we have not all been blocked as of yet, but rumblings inside Coast Guard Headquarters point in that direction.   We have uncovered what has been labeled the âugly underbellyâ of the Coast Guard and report on issues they sooner not have discussed.  Of the three main blogs, CoastGuardReport.org,  and two others we take on issues that otherwise would not be discussed at the level and with the sources inside the Coast Guard we use.<br />
As the Coast Guard tries to come to grips with its new and increased missions since 911, along with its increased funding, we have much to report on.  From the failed 27 billion dollar acquisition portfolio to upgrade the Coast Guardâs aged and deteriorating fleet of ships and aircraft, to a base infrastructure that is largely made up of base hand-me-downs from the other services, they have much to do.  Coast Guards 27 billion dollar acquisition portfolio is still being managed today by an Admiral with ZERO professional acquisition training, qualifications or certifications.  Why the congress let alone the Commandant of the Coast Guard donât tackle that easy fix is beyond anything anyone outside the Coast Guard can fathom.<br />
Good Luck Bloggers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103/comment-page-1#comment-342904</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15103#comment-342904</guid>
		<description>http://www.davno.ru/posters/1951/

way better poster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.davno.ru/posters/1951/" rel="nofollow">http://www.davno.ru/posters/1951/</a></p>
<p>way better poster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


