<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge reverses himself over Wikileaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:02:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109/comment-page-1#comment-345530</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 03:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109#comment-345530</guid>
		<description>Actually it could have been shut down, but fortunately US business and law is fraught with morons who think they know a thing or two about tech and really only enough to get someone hurt.  I was trying to come up with an analogy for what they did, but I couldn&#039;t think of anything that wouldn&#039;t make some pretty silly assumptions.  I&#039;m guessing that the fact that there are so few real world comparisons to shutting down someone who operates out of say, a store, and someone who&#039;s operating virtually.  I just hope that Wikileaks makes regular backups, just in case someone who isn&#039;t a complete idiot goes after them and finds their data center, not just a name registration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it could have been shut down, but fortunately US business and law is fraught with morons who think they know a thing or two about tech and really only enough to get someone hurt.  I was trying to come up with an analogy for what they did, but I couldn&#8217;t think of anything that wouldn&#8217;t make some pretty silly assumptions.  I&#8217;m guessing that the fact that there are so few real world comparisons to shutting down someone who operates out of say, a store, and someone who&#8217;s operating virtually.  I just hope that Wikileaks makes regular backups, just in case someone who isn&#8217;t a complete idiot goes after them and finds their data center, not just a name registration&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's must read whats written</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109/comment-page-1#comment-344844</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's must read whats written</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109#comment-344844</guid>
		<description>Reader&#039;s Write :  You did read the above, right? The wikileaks.org domain name is reinstated - why bother with the IP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader&#8217;s Write :  You did read the above, right? The wikileaks.org domain name is reinstated &#8211; why bother with the IP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109/comment-page-1#comment-344543</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 03:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15109#comment-344543</guid>
		<description>WikileaksCan not be shut down and is not shut down.

http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WikileaksCan not be shut down and is not shut down.</p>
<p><a href="http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks" rel="nofollow">http://88.80.13.160/wiki/Wikileaks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
