Welcome to p2pnet.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
REGISTER | LOGIN
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
Reviews
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Products
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Scroogle Search: 
Search
 
Web p2pnet   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
    Sponsored by
Frostwire
 
p2pnet
 


mp3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code

RIAA closes down Tufts Direct Connect

p2pnet news | RIAA News:- Tufts freshman Jonathan Evans used to run Tufts Direct Connect, a service he created on open source DC++.

But ‘used to’ is the operative phrase because thanks to Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG and their RIAA, TDC is no more.

File sharing is, “putting a significant number of our students at risk for legal action,” according to Judi Rennie, the university’s information technology supervisor at Tufts Online.

“UIT has seen a one-third increase this year in the amount of complaints sent by the entertainment industry,” says the Tufts Daily, going on:

“Dean of Student Affairs Bruce Reitman said that UIT forwarded a batch of 20 pre-litigation notices to his office last week. Pre-litigation notices offer students whom the industry has caught illegally sharing files the opportunity to avoid a lawsuit by settling. Settlements usually force students to pay thousands of dollars to the industry.”

Actually, the RIAA hasn’t caught anyone doing anything. It scams school authorities across America into threatening their own students with extortionate demand notices and some of the students literally incriminate themselves to the RIAA, admitting guilt where there was none, and paying $3,000 in the hope of avoiding a civil lawsuit.

“RIAA Marketing 101,” p2pnet posted recently.How to force your owners’ customers to buy ‘product’.”

We went on >>>

Hound them. Harass them. Label them ‘criminals’ and ‘thieves’. Call them liars. Humiliate them in the mainstream media every chance you get.

That’s The Big 4 Way, the Big 4 being Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG, the venal members of the organised music gang.

As a continuation of Stage II of their bizarre sue ‘em all marketing and sales plan, the labels have set their RIAA loose on a new batch of students at universities across the country.

Under what the RIAA’s Cara Duckworth has actually been quoted as calling ‘cool new legal services,’ they’re using staffs and administrations —- funded not by the corporate music industry, but by taxpayers —- to serve extortion letters to students, trying to hit them for upwards of three thousand dollars each.

Come through with a payment, buy our product from one of the corporate ’services’ we’ve shoehorned into your schools, and you’ll be safe, they say.

No wonder the RIAA people figure they’ve scored.

But far from protecting the students from a possible civil court appearance, the data might well be used against them sometime in the future – and the RIAA hasn’t had to do a thing. Schools staffs have done it for them.

However, what’s being heavily promoted by the Big 4 as a huge success in reality means absolutely nothing.

Nothing?

So far, the RIAA has talked University administrators into handing out around 5,500 of these ‘pre-settlement’ demands, as they’re called.

But given that the US Census Bureau Back to School: 2006-2007 was projecting 7,600,000 students would be enrolled in American colleges and universities by that fall, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out the RIAA student victimisation programme is going nowhere, and fast.

In addition, the RIAA onslaught is slowly and definitely polarising universities.

On one hand, you have universities such as Ohio which is doing everything it can to act as an upfront corporate copyright cop, even to the extent of spending scarce school funds on RIAA-sponsored ‘filter’ technology in the hope of keeping Warner Music, EMI, Vivendi Universal and Sony BMG and the RIAA happy.

And on the other you have teaching institutions such as Maine and San Francisco whose law students are actively helping RIAA victims, as well as lawyers who are defending them.

At Tuft, “We actually don’t monitor downloading or uploading,” Tufts Daily has Rennie saying “We’re not proactively seeking that stuff out. It’s only when it’s brought to us from an outside source” that UIT punishes students.”

But, “university officials did tell Evans, the freshman, that an outside source could potentially discover Tufts’ DC++ network and force them to punish him for running the peer-to-peer network, he told the Daily. The program was popular because, if used correctly, it was able to avoid detection by outside sources who sought to track Tufts network users’ Internet use.”

Evans said he shut down Tufts Direct Connect after a meeting with Rennie and Marj Minnihg, manager of networks and special projects at UIT.

“This move affected many Tufts students,” says the story, adding:

“Our estimate is roughly 20 percent of the residential students were using it at some point,” Rennie said.

Reitman’s office sent an e-mail to the student body on Feb. 12 warning of the dangers of DC++. “The Direct Connect hub and network has been touted as being a ’safe’ way to share copyrighted files, including music and movies,” the e-mail said. “These assurances could not be farther from the truth.”

But according to Evans, users who correctly follow DC++’s directions cannot be caught by monitors outside of the Tufts network, like the RIAA. “The basic premise is that the whole safety factor of the network is that people who report people for illegal downloading are outside officials on outside networks,” he said. “As long as UIT is not working to actually try to go and see what people are doing … then it’s not an issue.”

There is a potential for misuse, however, which could get students caught sharing files by outside sources. “DC++, if it’s misconfigured, could connect to outside networks, which would be vulnerable,” Evans said. “Because people accidentally don’t follow directions … no one can guarantee safety.”

Rennie said it was “absolutely” possible that the entertainment industry representatives had not picked up on Tufts’ DC++ network.

Evans was reluctant to shut down the Tufts Direct Connect network because he had hoped to use the network to distribute legal materials. “It’s a little disappointing for me because I’d hoped to make something out of it more than what people had been using it for,” he said.

“I do a lot of work with … musical artists, and I had hoped to make the network a way for artists to distribute their work around campus – stuff that’s legal and legitimate like that.”

Reitman and Evans both said they do not think shutting down Tufts Direct Connect will significantly decrease the amount of illegal downloading on campus. It will “probably not” have an effect, Reitman said.

Downloading is, “something that I think needs to be approached in a creative way,” he adds in the story.

“I think the industry needs to get creative and find other ways to stop it, because the number of students who seem to do it [demonstrates that current measures are] not enough to make students feel vulnerable …”

Said Educause recently:

“Campuses that offer legal downloading services typically must charge a student fee to cover the expense. Taken across all campuses, this practice could represent a transfer of over $400 million annually from higher education to the entertainment industry while raising the cost of higher education.

“Most colleges and universities have already considered offering legal, online music or movie services. Their students, however, have often told them they do not want to use or pay for these services because they do not carry musicians that the students want, do not work with Apple iPods, etc. The failure of industry to create and offer attractive downloading services should not lead to a federal solution in which colleges and universities must bear an additional financial burden so that industry can sell more of these services.”

[NOTE - p2pnet is running a special reader's survey. It only takes a minute - literally. Please click here. Cheers! And thanks ... Jon]

SlashdotSlashdot it! Add to Technorati Favorites

Also See:
Tufts Daily – Student terminates Direct Connect as RIAA turns up heat on colleges, March 3, 2008
7,600,000 students – RIAA continues futile university attacks, February 25, 2008
RIAA-sponsored ‘filter’ technology – Ohio University buys RIAA ’silver bullet’, February 28, 2008
Maine – Maine law students vs the RIAA, December 28, 2007
San Francisco – Dear p2pnet: about those law students ., February 28, 2008
raising the cost of higher education – Educause against anti-college act, February 21st, 2008


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

5 Responses to “RIAA closes down Tufts Direct Connect”

  1. Fred Says:

    ExtremeTech has an Enlightening article on the devastation that p2p piracy is having on PC game publishers.

    In short, piracy is at a staggering 92%, several publishers have gone under, small ones can’t get started and major ones are developing more and more for consoles, because it’s thankfully much harder to pirate those games.

    The article also addresses the excuse of “they wouldn’t have bought it anyway”.

    http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2271706,00.asp

  2. Reader's Write Says:

    I does not matter what the RIAA pigs are doing these days we know they are dying and are becomming irrelevant. My friend and I will keep firing at them until they are completly dead. It does not matter what they do we are not going to buy anything from them either. PERIOD!

    We will continue to promote the boycott of these parasites on a massive scale. Thye complain that their sales and income are collapsing but the boycott is still expending and they WILL NOT take into even of the damages they inflicted on our society and the citizen.

    Each of these parasites will pay for that. Dearly!

    Our countries are not lawless. Our constitutions are and will be enforced and protected.

    Down with the parasites!

  3. Reader's Write Says:

    I does not matter what the RIAA pigs are doing these days we know they are dying and are becomming irrelevant. My friend and I will keep firing at them until they are completly dead. It does not matter what they do we are not going to buy anything from them either. PERIOD!

    We will continue to promote the boycott of these parasites on a massive scale. They complain that their sales and income are collapsing but the boycott is still expending and they WILL NOT take into even of the damages they inflicted on our society and the citizen.

    Each of these parasites will pay for that. Dearly!

    Our countries are not lawless. Our constitutions are and will be enforced and protected.

    Down with the parasites!

  4. Reader's Write Says:

    Fred:

    Since you are a RIAA/MPAA agent tell your master that we are comming for them that they have better to start running now because we shall not and will not tolerate parasites like you and them in our societies.

    If I was you I will not be working for these pieces of garbage right now. So you have better to find yourself another job that will be useful to the society or you will go down with them.

    Meanwhile you can you and your friends put yourself into a trashcan and please close the lid to prevent odor!

    Thank you!

  5. Fred Says:

    Bloody hell!

    I find something of great interest that I wish to share with my comrades and I’m accused of being an RIAA/MPAA shill!

    For the record, I’m an ordinary user just like yourselves and have no connection with any media organisation. It was just shocking to read how piracy is devastating the PC games industry.

    The article also mentioned the positive aspects of DRM as used in Bioshock and Steam. If it only curbs rampant piracy by a couple of percent, it could be enough to save a publisher from going down in flames. Them and consumers win in such cases. That’s gotta be something to be glad about, no?

Leave a Reply

ONLY items referencing the post at hand, please. No links to personal sites, no personal attacks, trolling, freebie advertising, or off-topic posts. Thanks. And Cheers!

    Sponsored by
tek savvy