Tax credits and porn
p2pnet news view | Politics:- I’ve been rather quiet on the remarkable public outcry over Bill C-10, the legislation currently before the Senate that would give the Minister of Canadian Heritage the power to veto tax credits for films or television productions deemed objectionable.
I received an email urging me to "write your Government and support restricting or banning funding from the taxpayers for ‘pornography’." Given this nonsense, it is important to urge everyone to lend their voice to this issue by contacting their elected representatives and the Senate Banking committee to ask them not to pass the legislation with the film provision.
Much like the outcry against DMCA-style copyright reform, there has been a huge online protest with a Facebook group now over 21,000 members.
I believe there is a place for government support for culture. While that support is not unconditional, neither is it appropriate for government to reserve for itself a veto power over content it finds objectionable (the loss of tax credits could effectively kill some film productions). After the Prime Minister’s Office apparently pulled Canadian Heritage Minister Josee Verner away from the media, late last night she issued a press release claiming that the provision is designed to stop tax credits from being issued to films that include content that may be subject to prosecution under the Criminal Code.
This raises a couple of issues.
First, Verner says this will "affect a very small number of the over 1000 productions that receive tax credits annually." Can she name these productions? If there really are such films, that would go a long way to providing a better sense of exactly what the government has in mind.
Second, given the growing emphasis on criminalizing copyright infringement, would this include copyright related matters? Would it include films that focus on civil disobedience?
We don’t have these answers and until we do, this legislation should not pass.
Michael Geist
[Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist[at]uottawa.ca and is on-line at www.michaelgeist.ca.]
[NOTE - p2pnet is running a special reader's survey. It only takes a minute - literally. Please click here. Cheers! And thanks ... Jon]
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php
Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.
March 5th, 2008 at 9:21 am
Yes, it’s clearly nonsense to want to ensure that the people aren’t funding morally reprehensible material. Especially when you consider that the porn industry is always, always, always linked to prostitution, pedophilia, and exploitation of women and underage girls.
March 5th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
I hereby request abstracts be made available to all articles, I really don not wish to read the whole thing to know the core of the article, life’s too short, I want to be able to in-3-lines know I’m not interested, thank you.
March 6th, 2008 at 9:45 am
…and underaged boys and explotation of men and many other physically anomolied human beings. porn exploits no different then the news.
March 20th, 2008 at 3:04 am
The kid had swallowed a coin and it got stuck in his throat, and so his mother ran out in the street yelling for help. A man passing by took the boy by his shoulders and hit him with a few strong strokes on the back, and so he coughed the coin out. “I don’t know how to thank you, doc…”, his mother started. “I’m not a doctor”, the man replied, “I’m from the IRS”.