Whahahahahahaha! Now the perjury charges! What a pack of loser! Welcome to loserville!

Don’t bother! They are like El Kada. There is no “middle” with these kinds of people.

The RIAA is a bunch of parasites and terrorists. You don’t negociate with terrorists you kill them.

The current and crappy music industry, the one that gives us Britney Slut, madonaCrap, must die.

So step one: We kill them.

Then I am sure that once the place is free of worm we can find something cool for everyone.

1. the RIAA *will* refile those other 37 individually, you mark my words

2. downloading a song file is NOT illegal, no matter how many times the RIAA says it is, nor how many times the id10t media parrots their words…the illegality must be proven in a court because it is the USE of the song file that determines the illegality or not (parody, review, etc)

3. do not become complacent with these recent judge rulings. The tide can and has turned very rapidly in other cases that have been high-fived, so you must keep the intensity at full bore all the time

4. in this particular case, note that the inability to determine the proper “owner” of the IP address in question has not stopped other courts from ruling against *any person* the school assigns as that particular owner. For instance, a common-use computer in a dorm hallway is going to be assigned to the RA most likely, so that RA will be the “owner” for RIAA purposes even if they were not the logged-in person at the time of the alleged infringing action

Just because the IP address can not be reliably assigned to a particular person by the school, this has not stopped the RIAA in any previous court appearances. So, a big *grats* goes out to those students, but the battle ain’t over yet…