Welcome to P2PNET.net - The original daily p2p and digital news site. Always First!
Register | Login
RIAA News
Cool Stuff
MPAA News
Games / Consoles
News
Music
Movies
TV
Open Source
Mobiles
Advertising
Product News
P2P
Off Topic
Freedom
Politics
Interviews
Security
DRM
Links
Kids and Kartels
Search: 
Search
 
Web P2PNET   
Search: 
Search
Torrent Site Tracker
MP3rocket
 
Add real-time p2pnet headlines to YOUR site ! Click here to download our newsfeed code
p2pnet - rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | p2pnet celebrities: http://p2pnet.net/celeb.rss | Mobile? http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php

CMEC on copyright reform

p2pnet news | Politics:- The Council of Ministers of Education, Canada has published its third bulletin on copyright reform, this time explaining why it believes fair dealing is insufficient for its needs and that an Internet exception for education is the better approach.

The bulletin highlights again how CMEC and its allies have failed to fully appreciate the Supreme Court of Canada’s CCH v. LSUC decision on fair dealing which ruled that the provision is a user right that must be interpreted in a broad and liberal manner.

The CCH case represents an enormous win for the education community, providing great flexibility where materials are used for research and private study purposes (indeed, some groups have called on the government to legislatively scale back the CCH decision).

Yet for CMEC the decision isn’t good enough. In fact, it argues that there remains so much uncertainty in the law that educators and students find themselves in a legal limbo “awaiting some future court ruling to clarify more precisely the notion of ‘fair dealing’.” What utter nonsense. While there is no absolute certainty with fair dealing (or fair use for that matter), the state of Canadian law provides so much flexibility that it is very unlikely that a publisher or web site owner would sue an educational institution for most reasonable uses.

That doesn’t mean that education gets to use works for any purpose whatsoever, but why should it? Where the use extends well beyond what is fair, there should be compensation.

The CMEC and AUCC’s decision to create a divide among education groups by failing to target a more flexible fair dealing provision (which would address many of its concerns) not only undermines a pro-education copyright reform agenda, but surrenders the moral high ground. Canadians would unquestionably support fair access to educational materials, whether for research, private study or in the classroom.

The way to accomplish that is through a flexible fair dealing provision, not through an Internet exception that argues that education alone is entitled to free use.

Michael Geist
[Geist is the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa. He can be reached by email at mgeist[at]uottawa.ca and is on-line at www.michaelgeist.ca.]

[NOTE - p2pnet is running a special reader’s survey. It only takes 20-30 seconds and it’d be a huge help if you’d fill it in. Please click here. Cheers! And thanks … Jon]

SlashdotSlashdot it! Add to Technorati Favorites


Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!

Subscribe to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile - http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.php


Net access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.

HOME

Leave a Reply

    Advertisments
Teksavvy