Childhood — over by 11?
p2pnet news | P2P:- Dame Jacqueline Wilson is one of my favorite authors so naturally, I was interested when my Dad asked me what I thought about this >
“I think children act like adults at an alarmingly early age”, Jacqueline is quoted as saying in a story by the BBC. It goes on, “A poll [carried out by Random House, Jacqueline's publisher] suggested that more than half of parents believe childhood is now over by 11.”
I see what she means. A lot of kids my age ARE acting a bit ridiculously! My former best frienemy had three boyfriends last time I talked to her.
Boyfriends?! Er………
Back to the subject at hand, Jacqueline says she’s “pretty old fashioned”. Well, then, I am too! I personally don’t think it’s old fashioned to be worried about something that’s worth worrying about! While I was doing research for this, I came across a site showing you the “proper” way to apply makeup for a child.
The idea is to make them look like a model.
For a modeling party.
In another story on the BBC’s site for kids, Jacqueline, who is 62, said when SHE was 11 she was still wearing ankle socks and sandals and playing with dolls !
I and most of my friends have all gotten bored with dolls and are now more interested in clothes. But I personally am not trying to look older than I am. I think (I know!) part of the problem is peer pressure. There’s lots of pressure to look the same way, dress the same way, and act the same way. And if you don’t look do that, you get made fun of, you get bullied, etc.
Anyway, Jacqueline is right. The world is full of Mini Adults! One of the many reasons I’m glad I’m homeschooled is because of all the stuff going on in schools. Especially with girls. Cliques, fads, teasing, that kind of stuff. None of that in my homeschooling group! 
“With television and the internet playing a bigger and bigger role in their lives,” Jacqueline Wilson says in The Independent, “children are being introduced to ideas and issues which used to be kept away from them. Rather than having fun for the sake of it, and going out to play, they’re receiving the adult world in a largely unfiltered form.”
I don’t completly agree with this. TV and the Internet definitely play a big role in the lives of modern children, and certainly in my life, but I don’t neccesarily think it’s always a bad thing.
Granted, kids ARE exposed to lots of things that they maybe shouldn’t yet be exposed to. But it can be blocked out in one way or another.
I myself watch some shows I think are intended for an older audience, The Simpsons and Arrested Development, for example, but I try to look at things in context.
Also, when I’m watching that kind of thing, one of my parents is always with me. Of course,
My Mom, Liz, also had to get in on this. So here she is >>>
I just wanted to add to Jacqueline’s and Emma’s comments about TV.
While I agree that kids are exposed to too many adult ideas in today’s society, I think it would be more harmful to withdraw them from the world around them.
I may not really like the fact Emma is watching The Simpsons and Arrested Development, but she says she does so because she loves the humor. And her father is right there laughing along with her and explaining things when necessary.
Besides, at least in North America, issues such as homosexuality and racism are introduced to kids in grades 3 or 4, all in the aim of teaching them tolerance and understanding.
As for the Internet, Emma’s excellent homeschooling program is run from a distance education site. She also uses it regularly to do research for her learning work. And I use it to find information to help me in my teaching.
Everything in life has a good side and a bad side and you have to accept the whole package which does, of course, these days include the Internet.
3mm@ N3wt0n – p2pnet
[NOTE - p2pnet is running a special reader's survey. It only takes 20-30 seconds and it'd be a huge help if you'd fill it in. Please click here. Cheers! And thanks ... Jon]
Use free p2pnet newsfeeds for your site. It’s really easy!
Subscribe
to p2pnet.net | | rss feed: http://p2pnet.net/p2p.rss | | Mobile – http://p2pnet.net/index-wml.phpNet access blocked by government restrictions? Use Psiphon from the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto. Go here for details. Download here.
March 14th, 2008 at 11:00 am
wtf?
March 14th, 2008 at 11:18 am
Nepotism begins at home
March 14th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
Very good post, and absolutely correct. I’ve noticed that a lot of young kids are trying way too hard to look older, sometimes it gets to the point of being kind of disturbing. I’ve seen teenage girls with about 12 pounds of makeup on, and 11 year old girls wearing bikinis at the pool….
March 16th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
We talk about the advancement of children as though it isn’t still in a state of evolutionary flux. People are evolving at an absolutely fantastic rate and while we may not like or understand some of these evolutions they have telescoped to a point in our development where we can see them within a generation on the individual level.
Information is the new evolution. Americans would like to maintain the innocence of their children, seeing it as some grand boon to their kids to keep them naive and poorly informed of the world they live in. To resist these changes is no less well informed or clear minded than to resist alterations to the structure of copyright law.
This is not to say that we should suddenly stop guiding our children but their development is going to reflect our culture in the future. A 12 year old with ‘three boyfriends’ is…well, why not? A girl being sexually active that age would be worrisome but a girl having friends who she’s intimate with isn’t bizarre and having three is just a sign of the steady drift away from monogamy that our culture has been taking.
Do we begin sheltering our children even farther, hoping to put the genie back in the bottle? Shame them into conforming to the last generation’s ideology where sex and the display of affection are concerned? We saw where that lead us in the 60’s.
I suggest as an alternative it is time to begin /truly/ informing them. Abstinence education has been shown to cause increased sexuality in children who are put through it just as D.A.R.E. programs have been shown to do nothing to decrease drug use. Accepting the changes is step one. They have happened and will continue accelerating. Period. This is not a trend we can reverse.
So what do you tell kids that age? God, if you tell them about sex honestly you’ll have teeny boppers screwing in the streets, right? Cats and dogs living together, mass hysteria, right? Every time someone has declared the end of the world because of a cultural trend they’ve been right, haven’t they?
I think that honestly were it not for the mystique and danger surrounding much of sexual interaction, children would be less inclined to try it. No amount of sex education is going to change that we can’t stick our children in tiny boxes until they’re 21. The average age kids lose their virginity consensually hasn’t changed. It’s still about 14.8 years old. Same as it was a hundred and fifty years ago, same as it was during the middle ages, same as it was two thousand years ago.
It was only we, in the twentieth century, who criminalized sex at that age same as we criminalized the use of marijuana, the drinking of alcohol in the 1920’s, and a hundred other minor social issues in which the government should have no place. If a child is raped, that is time for the government to intervene, not when she sleeps with her boyfriend of the same age. If a man gets high and drives into a lamp post, that is time for the government to intervene…not if he does it in his own home. If a man and a man choose to love each other, the government shouldn’t give them tax breaks any more than a man and a woman who do. Period. It is not their place.
Every time we as a people have tried to legislate our morality it has /failed/. Keep this in mind.
March 17th, 2008 at 2:02 am
Chessie! Very well said!
*Applauds*
March 18th, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Closely argued, well written, edgy. Well done, Chessie
March 21st, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Hi Chessie
I have been snowed under for the last week so here is a belated reply to your comment. While I agree with you in general, I have a couple of points to make:
Yes, the average age today’s kids start engaging in sexual relations may be comparable to the age children started in past periods, but I would argue that today’s kids are lacking other life skills to balance out sexual maturity. Kids who lived in past eras generally spent their days surrounded by people of all ages, which would have given them a complete education in all the other aspects of relations between the sexes: they matured early in more ways than purely the sexual one. Our kids are surrounded for a large part of the day with others of the exact same age and probably the same level of emotional, intellectual and social development. In fact, by putting our kids in schools we forcibly delay the maturation of many life skills to the end of the teens.
As for government legislating our morality, who is ultimately responsible? Let’s not forget that it is we, the citizens, who elect government officials, we give them the right decide on matters concerning us. Perhaps we need to take back some of the responsibility of regulating morals and by that I don’t mean vigilante action against transgressors. I mean that we should educate our children on the right way to live in society. When we talk with our daughter about the relations between sexes we discuss not so much the sexual act (she has shown no desire to talk about it) but other aspects: the need to share and to give of oneself, the need to understand and respect your partner, and the need to have more than just sexual attraction for a succesfull relationship. Jacqueline Wilson would consider these subjects too mature for a child of eleven and a half years. I’m not sure Emma is able to fully grasp what we say but we’ll keep talking along the same lines until she can.