<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net censorship hotseat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:11:09 -0300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EE</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342/comment-page-1#comment-370427</link>
		<dc:creator>EE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342#comment-370427</guid>
		<description>There is an easy (yet expensive) technological fix.  A satellite and satellite dishes with transmitters can be used in the same way that American cable tv is piped into Iran.  The success of that program shows how difficult it can be to ferret out users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an easy (yet expensive) technological fix.  A satellite and satellite dishes with transmitters can be used in the same way that American cable tv is piped into Iran.  The success of that program shows how difficult it can be to ferret out users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342/comment-page-1#comment-369494</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342#comment-369494</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m missing something from this article. If *I* wanted to get around ISP blocks, I&#039;d simply use an encrypted web proxy, SSL connection, Tor (Vidalia), etc. So does this mean that those ISP&#039;s are &quot;whitelisting&quot; allowable websites and blocking everything else? Because that would be the only way to prevent (erm, lessen) access to undesired websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m missing something from this article. If *I* wanted to get around ISP blocks, I&#8217;d simply use an encrypted web proxy, SSL connection, Tor (Vidalia), etc. So does this mean that those ISP&#8217;s are &#8220;whitelisting&#8221; allowable websites and blocking everything else? Because that would be the only way to prevent (erm, lessen) access to undesired websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p2pvine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342/comment-page-1#comment-369492</link>
		<dc:creator>p2pvine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15342#comment-369492</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Net censorship hotseat...&lt;/strong&gt;

As the Internet moved into the mainstream in the mid-1990s, John Gilmore, one of the founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, coined the phrase âthe Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.âGilmoreâs comments were a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Net censorship hotseat&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As the Internet moved into the mainstream in the mid-1990s, John Gilmore, one of the founders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, coined the phrase âthe Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.â</p>
<p>Gilmoreâs comments were a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


