Comments on: ‘People WILL PAY for quality’ http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:10:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-379386 Reader's Write Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:09:11 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-379386 I remember reading some survey with this involving music, some large percentage of music files downloaded (85%+) were only downloaded because they were free. The interviewees said that if they had to pay, then they wouldnt have bothered with the music, and that they would have gladly paid for the 15% or so that they actually wanted. I remember reading some survey with this involving music, some large percentage of music files downloaded (85%+) were only downloaded because they were free. The interviewees said that if they had to pay, then they wouldnt have bothered with the music, and that they would have gladly paid for the 15% or so that they actually wanted.

]]> By: Ryan Scheel http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-379351 Ryan Scheel Fri, 28 Mar 2008 07:11:01 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-379351 Where was the RI/MPAA mentioned in there? Really, if you look at it, it is a blog post on logic, and nowhere there is a story, and nowhere is RI/MPAA mentioned or weapons. The three posts above mine are completely off topic! Really, I'd say it's spam. Anyways, I completely agree with the logic, but would like to see if anybody can come up with a counter-argument, such as somebody who hasn't seen this website alot, such as the first three anonymous-writers. So, StumbleUpon link to here (which is how I found this site about a year ago.) for hopefully a debate. Where was the RI/MPAA mentioned in there? Really, if you look at it, it is a blog post on logic, and nowhere there is a story, and nowhere is RI/MPAA mentioned or weapons. The three posts above mine are completely off topic! Really, I’d say it’s spam.

Anyways, I completely agree with the logic, but would like to see if anybody can come up with a counter-argument, such as somebody who hasn’t seen this website alot, such as the first three anonymous-writers.

So, StumbleUpon link to here (which is how I found this site about a year ago.) for hopefully a debate.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378983 Reader's Write Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:54:01 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378983 Rocket sniper rifle, anyone? Aim and shoot! Rocket sniper rifle, anyone?
Aim and shoot!

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378652 Reader's Write Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:18:26 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378652 Meh. They need a frag in the mouth, or else they will keep on saying bullshit. Meh. They need a frag in the mouth, or else they will keep on saying bullshit.

]]> By: Reader's Write http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378539 Reader's Write Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:31:02 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15412#comment-378539 Right now I will pay for nothing to any member of the RIAA or MPAA save with an M16 or a rocket launcher. Right now I will pay for nothing to any member of the RIAA or MPAA save with an M16 or a rocket launcher.

]]>