<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For whom does the Bell (Sympatico) sound?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:04:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bak</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/comment-page-1#comment-411132</link>
		<dc:creator>Bak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413#comment-411132</guid>
		<description>What are the options? Is Rogers better? Can a class action suit be initiated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the options? Is Rogers better? Can a class action suit be initiated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/comment-page-1#comment-382126</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413#comment-382126</guid>
		<description>Don,

My PN connection is virtually unusable now since throttling started, they are targeting any encrypted traffic as well as P2P, since all VPN connections are encrypted , they have all become virtually useless. We&#039;re going to fight this, Bell is not getting away with this.

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>My PN connection is virtually unusable now since throttling started, they are targeting any encrypted traffic as well as P2P, since all VPN connections are encrypted , they have all become virtually useless. We&#8217;re going to fight this, Bell is not getting away with this.</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/comment-page-1#comment-379945</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413#comment-379945</guid>
		<description>Never mind P2P traffic, what happens to encrypted business-related traffic?

I use a 3rd party DSL line to work from home and I keep reading that VPN and Skype traffic will also be targeted by this policy of Bell.  This would make it almost impossible to telecommute anymore. 

Does anyone know if this is true? Does anyone know the technical details of Bell&#039;s plan? 

So, Bell are not just threatening P2P down loaders, they are threatening my livelihood and will force folks like me back on the highway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind P2P traffic, what happens to encrypted business-related traffic?</p>
<p>I use a 3rd party DSL line to work from home and I keep reading that VPN and Skype traffic will also be targeted by this policy of Bell.  This would make it almost impossible to telecommute anymore. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if this is true? Does anyone know the technical details of Bell&#8217;s plan? </p>
<p>So, Bell are not just threatening P2P down loaders, they are threatening my livelihood and will force folks like me back on the highway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RooGaBoo</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/comment-page-1#comment-379630</link>
		<dc:creator>RooGaBoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413#comment-379630</guid>
		<description>Seems most are forgetting that the &quot;Hogs&quot; are paying for the service.  The companies are ADVERTINSING HIGH BANDWIDTH, are setting monthly limits on downloads, and no matter if you are a downloader or a web surfer, we are paying for the same contract!  If Bell and Rogers can&#039;t keep up with their advertised bandwidths they should fix thier networks.
Also, look at who is telling us that downloaders are affecting web surfing, not web surfers, but Bell...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems most are forgetting that the &#8220;Hogs&#8221; are paying for the service.  The companies are ADVERTINSING HIGH BANDWIDTH, are setting monthly limits on downloads, and no matter if you are a downloader or a web surfer, we are paying for the same contract!  If Bell and Rogers can&#8217;t keep up with their advertised bandwidths they should fix thier networks.<br />
Also, look at who is telling us that downloaders are affecting web surfing, not web surfers, but Bell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413/comment-page-1#comment-379236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 05:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15413#comment-379236</guid>
		<description>and now the revelation that Bell has quietly revamped its network to allow for throttling at the residential and wholesale level, there is the prospect of a perfect storm of events that may crystallize the issue for consumers, businesses, politicians, and regulators....

Clearly Bell should give a vast proportional refund now to all it&#039;s customers for their unacceptable reduction of their internet services for a start and Bell rightfully should be fined heaveily by the Courts for their unacceptable past false, misleading advertising of unlimted downloads too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and now the revelation that Bell has quietly revamped its network to allow for throttling at the residential and wholesale level, there is the prospect of a perfect storm of events that may crystallize the issue for consumers, businesses, politicians, and regulators&#8230;.</p>
<p>Clearly Bell should give a vast proportional refund now to all it&#8217;s customers for their unacceptable reduction of their internet services for a start and Bell rightfully should be fined heaveily by the Courts for their unacceptable past false, misleading advertising of unlimted downloads too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
