Comments on: EMI tries to nail MP3Tunes

By: Richuk

Richuk — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:41:01 +0000

What..the..fudge?

Is EMI totally deaf, blind and with an industrial case of technophobia?

If there was any risk of copyright violation it’s certainly no more risky than the ‘leaps of faith’ that other industries take every day.

“because some record labels would rather spend millions in attorney fees trying to outlaw all new technologies” – this quote truly boggles the mind. I’d love to sit down with an executive, and before sticking a pen where the sun don’t shine, put this question to them and try not to laugh…

By: Alter_Fritz

Alter_Fritz — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:07:26 +0000

Huh?

“A New York turned EMI’s demands down.”

Not sure, but I guess from the context that there is missing “judge” between “York” and “turned”, isn’t it?

By: Mostly Harmless

Mostly Harmless — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:15:21 +0000

FTFA “…users are transferring music to MP3Tunes, which is the same as distributing the music”.
I farted the melody to “Cry Me A River” at the food court in the mall. Is that the same as “distributing the music” too?