Comments on: RIAA ‘ID Boston students’ subpoena quashed

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:20:29 +0000

It’s not a “private” meeting. If Brennan wants to be there, he or his attorney can be, but hasn’t showed up to court, responded to the court, or anything else. Hence the motion for default judgment. Beckerman is just spinning again.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:57:49 +0000

There is no making available language in any US law. It only comes from the mouths of shill **AA lawyers (and other shills too I guess).

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:37:14 +0000

“know the difference between publication and distribution and what you are doing one or the other”

Actually it more complex.

File sharers need to now the difference between publication and distribution AND MAKING AVAILABLE and what you are doing one or the other

By: The law proffesor

The law proffesor — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:27:57 +0000

“âpublicationâ and âdistributionâ are NOT synonyms”

Just great. Now we are more confused as to what is infringement.

So, files sharers out there. Before doing anymore sharing go get a law degree with a concentration in intellectual property and make sure that you know the difference between publication and distribution and what you are doing one or the other. You also have to know which of the two is legal and which is illegal.

Sure, the law degree will cost you several hundred thousand dollars, but if the court traps you for infringement it may bankrupt you.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:19:28 +0000

I imagine the content of the “Private meeting”: The RIAA to the judge: We give you a lot of money if you reverse your rulling overwise . . .

By: Alter_Fritz

Alter_Fritz — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:59:08 +0000

Tony Its not private from a legal standpoint, Ray jsut called it this way since the defendant had not made ANY appearance before the court so far.
(the RIAA lawyer certified that he put the notice into the mail to some address where they claim it would reach the defendant, but who knows, maybe he has not the slightest clue that he is even sued at all)

By: Tony Lopez

Tony Lopez — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:56:14 +0000

Something stinks here. A private meeting? They don’t understand the questions? Where’s Brennan’s lawyer? Whoever’s representing him should also be privy.

They should all be fined for misuse of legal system. After all, they do it consistently.