Comments on: Bell Canada tries to justify throttling

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:59:40 +0000

content control

joost = bad

By: APolInThr

APolInThr — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:10:34 +0000

If some subscribers are consuming too much bandwidth then adjust your products. Do the math and introduce a simple bandwidth cap for all subscribers with the option to purchase additional bandwidth if required. The “95%” (or general majority) will not be affected, the “5%” apparently causing so much trouble will be effectively regulated, and you’ll have no need for DPI hardware running biased protocol policies. How is it harder than that, or is the truth that there’s a much bigger game being played here.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:53:43 +0000

Yes. Internet is a public thing and nasty rogues corporation such as bell are stilling the public property. It is like if sudenly I put a toll boot on you near buy street and ask anyone to pay to go through. This is the same. Our country and resources are no longer controled by our democraticly ellected governement but by corporations:

REVOLUTION!

By: Alter_Fritz

Alter_Fritz — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:09:09 +0000

I don’t know how it was done in canada, but I doubt it was this the managers that payed for the network. they haven’t “invested” their money but the money from the gov/taxpayers into the network since they have/had a monopoly on the market, wasn’t it that way?