<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bell Canada tries to justify throttling</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-415097</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-415097</guid>
		<description>content control

joost = bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>content control</p>
<p>joost = bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APolInThr</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-412801</link>
		<author>APolInThr</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 09:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-412801</guid>
		<description>If some subscribers are consuming too much bandwidth then adjust your products.  Do the math and introduce a simple bandwidth cap for all subscribers with the option to purchase additional bandwidth if required.  The "95%" (or general majority) will not be affected, the "5%" apparently causing so much trouble will be effectively regulated, and you'll have no need for DPI hardware running biased protocol policies.  How is it harder than that, or is the truth that there's a much bigger game being played here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some subscribers are consuming too much bandwidth then adjust your products.  Do the math and introduce a simple bandwidth cap for all subscribers with the option to purchase additional bandwidth if required.  The &#8220;95%&#8221; (or general majority) will not be affected, the &#8220;5%&#8221; apparently causing so much trouble will be effectively regulated, and you&#8217;ll have no need for DPI hardware running biased protocol policies.  How is it harder than that, or is the truth that there&#8217;s a much bigger game being played here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-411465</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-411465</guid>
		<description>Yes. Internet is a public thing and nasty rogues corporation such as bell are stilling the public property. It is like if sudenly I put a toll boot on you near buy street and ask anyone to pay to go through. This is the same. Our country and resources are no longer controled by our democraticly ellected governement but by corporations:

REVOLUTION!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Internet is a public thing and nasty rogues corporation such as bell are stilling the public property. It is like if sudenly I put a toll boot on you near buy street and ask anyone to pay to go through. This is the same. Our country and resources are no longer controled by our democraticly ellected governement but by corporations:</p>
<p>REVOLUTION!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alter_Fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-411374</link>
		<author>Alter_Fritz</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15580#comment-411374</guid>
		<description>I don't know how it was done in canada, but I doubt it was this the managers that payed for the network. they haven't "invested" their money but the money from the gov/taxpayers into the network since they have/had a monopoly on the market, wasn't it that way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how it was done in canada, but I doubt it was this the managers that payed for the network. they haven&#8217;t &#8220;invested&#8221; their money but the money from the gov/taxpayers into the network since they have/had a monopoly on the market, wasn&#8217;t it that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
