<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web tripwires block &#8216;in-flight&#8217; ad attacks</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15634</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bah</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15634#comment-418820</link>
		<author>bah</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15634#comment-418820</guid>
		<description>AdMuncher FTW.

But, seriously, do these people never stop? Advertising should just be outlawed. Let word of mouth sell your product, depend on reputation of users/buyers determine how well your product sells, then we will get goods that sell well because they are good not because they are hyped.

Never happen, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdMuncher FTW.</p>
<p>But, seriously, do these people never stop? Advertising should just be outlawed. Let word of mouth sell your product, depend on reputation of users/buyers determine how well your product sells, then we will get goods that sell well because they are good not because they are hyped.</p>
<p>Never happen, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EE</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15634#comment-418627</link>
		<author>EE</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15634#comment-418627</guid>
		<description>While it is a good idea to check for transparent proxies injecting ads, I am willing to bet that this will be used against users wishing to block loud, annoying, flashing or otherwise offensive ads on their browsers.  All a website has to do is run an "integrity check" to see if a user is blocking there ads and then restrict the content provided to them.

I applaud their creativity but fear this will have a detrimental affect on my net experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is a good idea to check for transparent proxies injecting ads, I am willing to bet that this will be used against users wishing to block loud, annoying, flashing or otherwise offensive ads on their browsers.  All a website has to do is run an &#8220;integrity check&#8221; to see if a user is blocking there ads and then restrict the content provided to them.</p>
<p>I applaud their creativity but fear this will have a detrimental affect on my net experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
