<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr X the Online Spy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1569/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1569</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:56:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1569/comment-page-1#comment-9815</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-9815</guid>
		<description>I ran into a similar site, called Sitebuster, doing what Mr X does, but it seems to be an organization finding individual users who break their terms of service agreements with sites like Tripod and Geocities by posting porn.

http://www.haktanir.org/sitebuster/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into a similar site, called Sitebuster, doing what Mr X does, but it seems to be an organization finding individual users who break their terms of service agreements with sites like Tripod and Geocities by posting porn.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.haktanir.org/sitebuster/" rel="nofollow">http://www.haktanir.org/sitebuster/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1569/comment-page-1#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 22:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>Filth? WTF does that mean in regards to this story? This is becoming a war of propaganda and semantics. &quot;Pirates&quot;, &quot;filth&quot;. How long before P2P &quot;pirates&quot; are referred to using the buzzword du jour, ooh, TERRORISTS?!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filth? WTF does that mean in regards to this story? This is becoming a war of propaganda and semantics. &#8220;Pirates&#8221;, &#8220;filth&#8221;. How long before P2P &#8220;pirates&#8221; are referred to using the buzzword du jour, ooh, TERRORISTS?!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/1569/comment-page-1#comment-2204</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 04:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2204</guid>
		<description>you know bureaucrats have a knack for finding new places to extend useless and inefficient bureaucracy, they&#039;ve been dying to get to the internet for years, &quot;theres gotta be some money in it somewhere for us&quot; they say, lets set up policing units, regulators etc etc, lets bog it all done to the pace of a license renewal office, then we&#039;ll improve on it and say look at what we did (even though without them it would have been lightyears ahead of where it was anyways)

Kill all P2P?? Why is it you suppose that RIAA et al not only want to kill copyright infringment on p2p but P2P apps/networks themselves??

Why it&#039;s because eventually artists will wake up to the fact that they can cut the bloodsuckers right out of the loop and distribute w/out them, now that possibility is a ways off right now, but best to eliminate any possibility of it happening, and to do that they have to destroy or control the channels of distribution.  Therefore all P2P nets must be quashed, unless RIAA endorsed (owned).  They are pathetically transparent in their fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know bureaucrats have a knack for finding new places to extend useless and inefficient bureaucracy, they&#8217;ve been dying to get to the internet for years, &#8220;theres gotta be some money in it somewhere for us&#8221; they say, lets set up policing units, regulators etc etc, lets bog it all done to the pace of a license renewal office, then we&#8217;ll improve on it and say look at what we did (even though without them it would have been lightyears ahead of where it was anyways)</p>
<p>Kill all P2P?? Why is it you suppose that RIAA et al not only want to kill copyright infringment on p2p but P2P apps/networks themselves??</p>
<p>Why it&#8217;s because eventually artists will wake up to the fact that they can cut the bloodsuckers right out of the loop and distribute w/out them, now that possibility is a ways off right now, but best to eliminate any possibility of it happening, and to do that they have to destroy or control the channels of distribution.  Therefore all P2P nets must be quashed, unless RIAA endorsed (owned).  They are pathetically transparent in their fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
