<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bell Canada&#8217;s &#8216;5% of users&#8217; claim trashed</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Stray Mongrel</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-435942</link>
		<author>Stray Mongrel</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-435942</guid>
		<description>So, Bell is just making up crap to justify their actions, which were most likely prompted by the urging of music/movie corporations to end p2p traffic.

Glad as hell I don't have them for an ISP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Bell is just making up crap to justify their actions, which were most likely prompted by the urging of music/movie corporations to end p2p traffic.</p>
<p>Glad as hell I don&#8217;t have them for an ISP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul kambulow</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-433287</link>
		<author>Paul kambulow</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-433287</guid>
		<description>Bell is looking to make more money for the same servcies. I have maintained my band with usages the last year and i have noticed that Bell's new throttling limit plan will costme double over last year.. wow. So the greedy hogs refers to Bell firstly still</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bell is looking to make more money for the same servcies. I have maintained my band with usages the last year and i have noticed that Bell&#8217;s new throttling limit plan will costme double over last year.. wow. So the greedy hogs refers to Bell firstly still</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432841</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432841</guid>
		<description>In the CAIP filing it states:
"The DPI equipment that Bell uses to throttle its competitors’ traffic is manufactured by Ellacoya which was recently acquired by Arbor Networks."

So Bell IS using them and pulling numbers out of a hat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the CAIP filing it states:<br />
&#8220;The DPI equipment that Bell uses to throttle its competitors’ traffic is manufactured by Ellacoya which was recently acquired by Arbor Networks.&#8221;</p>
<p>So Bell IS using them and pulling numbers out of a hat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432836</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432836</guid>
		<description>All ISPs use the same excuse that a small minority use p2p services and that those users ruin the experience for everyone else. This they think, gives them a mandate to restrict users, protocols, and times at which activities can be performed. These claims are specious and without substance, and they know it. Their unwillingness to invest in infrastructure is the source of this feigning; instead they wish to maintain the status quo, which evidently is doomed to failure as the internet advances.

AVDITE VERBA EA ET BENE OBSERVATE . MVNDI SEMPER PROTINVS MOVET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All ISPs use the same excuse that a small minority use p2p services and that those users ruin the experience for everyone else. This they think, gives them a mandate to restrict users, protocols, and times at which activities can be performed. These claims are specious and without substance, and they know it. Their unwillingness to invest in infrastructure is the source of this feigning; instead they wish to maintain the status quo, which evidently is doomed to failure as the internet advances.</p>
<p>AVDITE VERBA EA ET BENE OBSERVATE . MVNDI SEMPER PROTINVS MOVET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432757</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15738#comment-432757</guid>
		<description>I have another hypothesis. Bell is in bed with the parasites from  the majors music and movie companies and this is a conspiracy from this entertainement cartel.

There is a big huge problem though for the crappy ISP such as Bell and Comcast: Did you hear about WIFI p2p network that work without internet and is ready to catch up? That will hurt if it does.

I Just noticed that's all. I am not working for them so. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have another hypothesis. Bell is in bed with the parasites from  the majors music and movie companies and this is a conspiracy from this entertainement cartel.</p>
<p>There is a big huge problem though for the crappy ISP such as Bell and Comcast: Did you hear about WIFI p2p network that work without internet and is ready to catch up? That will hurt if it does.</p>
<p>I Just noticed that&#8217;s all. I am not working for them so. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
