<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radiohead, MTV, human trafficking video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net - reader powered</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:36:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787/comment-page-1#comment-443997</link>
		<dc:creator>Rekrul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787#comment-443997</guid>
		<description>About the no more free downloads;

Call me crazy, but I never thought it was a good idea for them to make payment optional. If you give people a choice and tell them that it&#039;s ok if they don&#039;t pay, many of them won&#039;t. Then they&#039;ll use up the bandwidth downloading free copies. Tell them that they need to pay maybe $2 to download the album, and 100% of the downloads will be paid for. No, not everyone will buy it, some will still download it for free from P2P networks. The point is that they won&#039;t waste the band&#039;s bandwidth downloading free copies from them. The only downloads from their site will be paid for. Also, many people will think &quot;It&#039;s only $2 and it&#039;s the proper thing to do, so why not?&quot;

You don&#039;t have to completely dump the traditional buyer/seller business model, just give people what they want at a good price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the no more free downloads;</p>
<p>Call me crazy, but I never thought it was a good idea for them to make payment optional. If you give people a choice and tell them that it&#8217;s ok if they don&#8217;t pay, many of them won&#8217;t. Then they&#8217;ll use up the bandwidth downloading free copies. Tell them that they need to pay maybe $2 to download the album, and 100% of the downloads will be paid for. No, not everyone will buy it, some will still download it for free from P2P networks. The point is that they won&#8217;t waste the band&#8217;s bandwidth downloading free copies from them. The only downloads from their site will be paid for. Also, many people will think &#8220;It&#8217;s only $2 and it&#8217;s the proper thing to do, so why not?&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to completely dump the traditional buyer/seller business model, just give people what they want at a good price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787/comment-page-1#comment-443659</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787#comment-443659</guid>
		<description>http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9932361-7.html and a shitload more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9932361-7.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9932361-7.html</a> and a shitload more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787/comment-page-1#comment-443403</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader's Write</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15787#comment-443403</guid>
		<description>What the hell does the opening paragraph have to do with the rest of the article?  And where&#039;s your source on that quote/paraphrase??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the hell does the opening paragraph have to do with the rest of the article?  And where&#8217;s your source on that quote/paraphrase??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
