Comments on: Tanya Andersen zeroes in on RIAA

By: Ryan

Ryan — Tue, 20 May 2008 21:37:47 +0000

And dont forget to add this follow up article from Sweden:

http://ezee.se/articles-blog/2008/05/20/theres-a-new-superhero-in-town-_-and-her-names-tanya-andersen/

By: DownWithRiaa

DownWithRiaa — Tue, 06 May 2008 05:19:25 +0000

Too bad those seemingly corrupt judges can’t be exposed. Hmmmm or maybe there is a trail to follow. I would like to see the ones who are ruling overwhelmingly in favor of the RIAA under a microscope. They make a mockery of the judicial system. There are honest judges, more I hope than corrupt. How could any judge look at what the RIAA and it’s little cronies do to regular innocent people and not be sickened. I hope Anderson takes this all the way. It’s not about money anymore, it’s about the freedoms we won’t have if this Mafia laced industry keeps buying off our political advocates. It’s so damned obvious.

Before I learned of all this I was a regular music lover, movie lover, ect.. But reading this has made me so angry that I stopped buying any form of media that would line the pockets of these greedy evil bastards. If I really want it and it is something that they produce then I now find it in a form that they wont make a penny, or I just do without. I am willing to bet they have created more pirates than ever with all the coverage. I myself would not have known without it. I really hope she sticks it to them. They deserve it more than anyone!!

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Tue, 06 May 2008 05:04:14 +0000

According to the magnitude of the charges a length of time is allowed to prepare. The RIAA however will abuse that to the limit, and make it last a lifetime if possible. Meanwhile they are probably having a good chuckle about it over luncheon cocktails, never believing for a second that anything can be proven against them.

By: randomguy656

randomguy656 — Tue, 06 May 2008 03:03:11 +0000

Your not allowed to fight the big 4!
You are only allowed to give them monies so they can not give any of it to the artists they claim to be protecting….

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 05 May 2008 23:47:25 +0000

” It is NOT a US court. ”

Really ?
Where is this particular court located ?
Oregon, looks like.
That’s in the US.
For a lay person to say a US court is perfectly acceptable,
no matter how you would like to nitpick it.

” Why are they being allowed to drag their feet about this discovery order? ”

That’s a damn good question.
I would like to know why they have been allowed to do a whole lot of what
they have done.
It seems like nearly every thing that comes before Levy goes their way, and strangely
Levy gets EVERYTHING for the RIAA in that jurisdiction, contrary to how the system
normally works in that state.

They get a LOT of breaks.
Money talks, I guess.

( Yes, I am aware that ‘judge’ Levey has nothing to do with Anderson, but he is one of
several that seem bent on giving the RIAA anything they wish, with dressing )

By: Stray Mongrel

Stray Mongrel — Mon, 05 May 2008 23:08:52 +0000

Why are they being allowed to drag their feet about this discovery order?

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 05 May 2008 20:16:58 +0000

It is NOT a US court.

By: Reader's Write

Reader's Write — Mon, 05 May 2008 19:19:38 +0000

I don’t understant why a US court would protect a cartel of foreign parasites!

To me it look like treason!