<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIAA thumbs its nose at judge</title>
	<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844</link>
	<description>p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-488012</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 05:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-488012</guid>
		<description>God, I hate the RIAA.  Can't we just hunt them down like dogs and kill them all???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, I hate the RIAA.  Can&#8217;t we just hunt them down like dogs and kill them all???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-460941</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 09:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-460941</guid>
		<description>I guess they're still so arrogant they feel no-one should dare question their propaganda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess they&#8217;re still so arrogant they feel no-one should dare question their propaganda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rekrul</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454776</link>
		<author>Rekrul</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454776</guid>
		<description>"I guess I underestimated even their stupidity."

How is that even possible? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess I underestimated even their stupidity.&#8221;</p>
<p>How is that even possible? <img src='http://www.p2pnet.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454472</link>
		<author>huh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454472</guid>
		<description>"This is the level of respect show by these foreign parasites for our law our governement [sic] and our institution."

Are you referring to the RIAA's lawyers?  What makes you think they're foreign?  A bit of xenophobic angst, eh?

"We don’t need fascists or terorists in our contry nor can we afford to keep them there."

You're proposing to ship out all the skinheads and many members of Bush's administration, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is the level of respect show by these foreign parasites for our law our governement [sic] and our institution.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you referring to the RIAA&#8217;s lawyers?  What makes you think they&#8217;re foreign?  A bit of xenophobic angst, eh?</p>
<p>&#8220;We don’t need fascists or terorists in our contry nor can we afford to keep them there.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re proposing to ship out all the skinheads and many members of Bush&#8217;s administration, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454416</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-454416</guid>
		<description>This is the level of respect show by these foreign parasites for our law our governement and our institution.

Those of them who are US citizen should be jailed for treason and those who are not should be extradited to Burma where they belong.

We don't need fascists or terorists in our contry nor can we afford to keep them there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the level of respect show by these foreign parasites for our law our governement and our institution.</p>
<p>Those of them who are US citizen should be jailed for treason and those who are not should be extradited to Burma where they belong.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need fascists or terorists in our contry nor can we afford to keep them there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader's Write</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-453442</link>
		<author>Reader's Write</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 03:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-453442</guid>
		<description>They work on the principle that if you throw enough mud some will stick. No matter that it's the same mud already rejected beforehand. The thing is, will the judge recognize it, or will he/she be the kind who doesn't do his homework or has a short memory? It's just bad luck to get the same judge again huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They work on the principle that if you throw enough mud some will stick. No matter that it&#8217;s the same mud already rejected beforehand. The thing is, will the judge recognize it, or will he/she be the kind who doesn&#8217;t do his homework or has a short memory? It&#8217;s just bad luck to get the same judge again huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-453385</link>
		<author>Josh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-453385</guid>
		<description>Umm Ray... 28 pages of repeated arguments + 3 pages of explanations = 31 page brief

It's a little trick I like to call "Math" (ah, good ol' Dilbert, so applicable).

Nonetheless, point taken. And I like the quiz. I would have to agree with George's answer... d and d
(I really hope I passed!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm Ray&#8230; 28 pages of repeated arguments + 3 pages of explanations = 31 page brief</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a little trick I like to call &#8220;Math&#8221; (ah, good ol&#8217; Dilbert, so applicable).</p>
<p>Nonetheless, point taken. And I like the quiz. I would have to agree with George&#8217;s answer&#8230; d and d<br />
(I really hope I passed!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man George</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-452919</link>
		<author>Man George</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-452919</guid>
		<description>The answers are (a) and (a), as long as the right people are 'reached'.
Otherwise, for the normal layperson, the answers are (d) and (d).

Hmmmm, geddofff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answers are (a) and (a), as long as the right people are &#8216;reached&#8217;.<br />
Otherwise, for the normal layperson, the answers are (d) and (d).</p>
<p>Hmmmm, geddofff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Beckerman</title>
		<link>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-452877</link>
		<author>Ray Beckerman</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15844#comment-452877</guid>
		<description>I guess I underestimated even their stupidity.

Well I hope I've learned something from this experience.

I've drafted this pop quiz for the litigation buffs out there:

The facts.

A lawyer just filed a 30-page brief in which he (a) devoted 28 pages to repeating the same arguments he had made in a motion that was decided less than 8 months earlier, and (b) devoted 3 pages to telling the judge that his previous ruling was "wrongly decided".

Question #1

What will happen?
(a) The lawyer will win the motion.
(b) The lawyer will lose the motion.
(c) The lawyer will have to find a new line of work.
(d) Both (b) and (c)

Question #2

If you are the client who pays lawyers to do things like that you are
(a) A smart businessperson
(b) A moron
(c) A fool
(d) Both (b) and (c)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I underestimated even their stupidity.</p>
<p>Well I hope I&#8217;ve learned something from this experience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve drafted this pop quiz for the litigation buffs out there:</p>
<p>The facts.</p>
<p>A lawyer just filed a 30-page brief in which he (a) devoted 28 pages to repeating the same arguments he had made in a motion that was decided less than 8 months earlier, and (b) devoted 3 pages to telling the judge that his previous ruling was &#8220;wrongly decided&#8221;.</p>
<p>Question #1</p>
<p>What will happen?<br />
(a) The lawyer will win the motion.<br />
(b) The lawyer will lose the motion.<br />
(c) The lawyer will have to find a new line of work.<br />
(d) Both (b) and (c)</p>
<p>Question #2</p>
<p>If you are the client who pays lawyers to do things like that you are<br />
(a) A smart businessperson<br />
(b) A moron<br />
(c) A fool<br />
(d) Both (b) and (c)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
