Comments on: CIPPIC assails Bell on Deep Packet Inspection http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917 p2pnet.net offers not-your-lamescream news on movies music digital media P2P peer-to-peer TV television file sharing freedom of speech open source product news Wifi mobiles company Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:44:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: johnnyg0 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-466549 johnnyg0 Wed, 14 May 2008 14:11:04 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-466549 Stray: There are many providers other than Bell in quebec (I am with AEI)... but the problem is every DSL ISP have to use Bell's network (because its the only one available), they are affected too by Bell's new traffic shaping policy (and they are royally pissed about it). So the only alternative is cable (videotron), with a transfer cap, .. oh and also videotron owned by a company (Quebecor) who owns a music retail chain (Archambault).. I'm not sure I want to go there :) Stray:

There are many providers other than Bell in quebec (I am with AEI)… but the problem is every DSL ISP have to use Bell’s network (because its the only one available), they are affected too by Bell’s new traffic shaping policy (and they are royally pissed about it).

So the only alternative is cable (videotron), with a transfer cap, .. oh and also videotron owned by a company (Quebecor) who owns a music retail chain (Archambault).. I’m not sure I want to go there :)

]]> By: Josh http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465735 Josh Tue, 13 May 2008 23:45:34 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465735 Then they'll try to sue us for "pirating the internet" Then they’ll try to sue us for “pirating the internet”

]]> By: Stray Mongrel http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465374 Stray Mongrel Tue, 13 May 2008 19:33:58 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465374 You need more consumer choices, so that Bell customers that object to this company's service, can seek a different provider, regardless of "Net Neutrality" If Net Neutrality remains unenforced, service providers would still retain the power to decide whether or not to regulate their connection service. Providers that advertised a service centered around "Unregulated Connections" would have a market. This is why I still think the internet should be free, and wireless. If the internet becomes too regulated, rogue networks will probably surface, and create a "free internet" of sorts. Imagine p2p traffic on these. You need more consumer choices, so that Bell customers that object to this company’s service, can seek a different provider, regardless of “Net Neutrality”

If Net Neutrality remains unenforced, service providers would still retain the power to decide whether or not to regulate their connection service. Providers that advertised a service centered around “Unregulated Connections” would have a market.

This is why I still think the internet should be free, and wireless. If the internet becomes too regulated, rogue networks will probably surface, and create a “free internet” of sorts. Imagine p2p traffic on these.

]]> By: Curmudgeon http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465263 Curmudgeon Tue, 13 May 2008 17:41:12 +0000 http://www.p2pnet.net/story/15917#comment-465263 A PDF copy of the submission itself can be viewed at this link http://www.cippic.ca/uploads/Bell-DPI-PIPEDAcomplaint_09May08.pdf It's very readable and worth a look. A PDF copy of the submission itself can be viewed at this link

http://www.cippic.ca/uploads/Bell-DPI-PIPEDAcomplaint_09May08.pdf

It’s very readable and worth a look.

]]>